Hi, since you added this route, if you are still active it would be great if you could please have a look at this note osm.org/note/4451400 - thanks!

Hi, since you edited this route, it would be great if you could please have a look at note osm.org/note/4451400 - thanks!

Hi, since you edited this route, it would be great if you could please have a look at note osm.org/note/4451400 - thanks!

Hi, since you added this route, if you're still active it would be great if you could please have a look at the note osm.org/note/4451449 - thanks!

Hi, since you edited this route, if you're still active it would be great if you could please have a look at the note osm.org/note/4451449 - thanks!

I meant recently edited, not added!

Hi, since you recently added this route, it would be great if you could please have a look at the note osm.org/note/4451449 - thanks!

Hi, should the path alongside Piers Gill really be marked as difficult_alpine_hiking? The Wasdale MRT Facebook post is about people accidentally following the bed of the gill, isn't it? Whereas osm.org/way/283419527
is the path described on https://www.wmrt.org.uk/advice/accident-black-spots/piers-gill-scafell-pike/ as "narrow difficult path". I haven't walked it, so I can't judge its difficulty, but T6 seems very high?

Oh and the width between planters is also something we could tag (maxwidth:physical), hopefully that should make it clear to a clever cycle router that this isn't really a route you'd use unless you have to

Hi, you might want to weigh in here: osm.org/changeset/156133552

Hi, thanks for flagging this with review_requested. I don’t think we should delete the highway=pedestrian segment, because that will break pedestrian routing. Pedestrians can still walk from Leith Walk to Iona Street, so they should be connected.

Bicycle access is indeed awkward because of the kerbs and planters, but as far as I know it’s legal: the sign at the end of Iona Street is no motor vehicles, not no entry. Surely this is on purpose?

That’s why I added the barrier=kerb, kerb=raised node but left GinaroZ’s bicycle=designated on the highway=pedestrian alone. We could weaken “designated” to “yes”. Another thing we can do on the tagging side is adding the planters (barrier=planter).

Which navigation app was suggesting that you cycle there? We could ask them to avoid routing bicycles over a high kerb where possible.

I've mapped it now. Please let me know if you are having any issues - in that case, we should figure out if the fault lies with the data or the app you are using before editing the data

Hi, what does drink:beer=village_green mean?
osm.org/way/1112534662
Was this maybe a mistake that should be removed?

Hi, could you please have a look at note osm.org/note/4312048? Thanks!

In short, judging from out of copyright NLS Maps, this is a place name / a name for this part of the river, not a swimming pool, and I suspect the Maproulette challenge that changed it to swimming_pool may have been mistaken about the assumption that all places tagged water=pool were used for swimming. Do you know that this place is actually used for swimming?

There are new bus lane controls here, northbound is bus and cycle only, 24/7, southbound is bus, cycle and taxi only from noon to 6am, according to the council. I'd like to map these once I get a chance to check in person

Hi, which map specifically was behaving as if buses were also one way only? OpenStreetMap.org doesn't have bus routing. Asking because it might be an issue with the map/app (so could be useful to let the developers know)

Hi you might want to check osm.org/way/217947523 :-) looks like you moved a node by accident

Hi, could you please have a look at note osm.org/note/4312048? Thanks!

Hi, you changed water=pool to sport=swimming as part of a Maproulette challenge to change incorrect swimming pool tags. But judging from out of copyright NLS Maps, this is a place name / a name for this part of the river, not a swimming pool. Anyway, I'm getting in touch to ask if you know that this spot is actually used for swimming. I'm also wondering if the Maproulette challenge you did maybe made the wrong assumption that the tag water=pool had always been used for swimming pools... (Here's a photo of the area, I can't see a swimming pool: https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/4768275)

Nevermind - I've realised you split it into a coastline way and a single-member island relation!

Happy mapping!