OpenStreetMap 标志 OpenStreetMap

I’ve just found a great edit by user Math1985 near my home location. This user added a lot of details based on a local survey - the best way to map!

Hopefully looking at such edits in the new History tab will be a small additional reward for your survey efforts. Check this out:

New History tab

Now compare this with the current view which is filled with world wide edits like massive Wikipedia link fixes, tag spelling fixes etc.

Current History tab

See this example here.

电子邮件图标 Bluesky图标 Facebook图标 LinkedIn图标 Mastodon图标 Telegram图标 X图标

讨论

Tom Chance2013年01月18日 13:37 的评论

This is a huge improvement, it would be great to roll this out to the OSM homepage.

One of the other frustrating shortcomings of the current history features on the web site, which your panel goes some way to fixing, is that you can’t visualise features that have been deleted. A next step would be to show the feature in the map view on pages like osm.org/browse/way/131004269

ppawel2013年01月18日 14:31 的评论

@Tom: Exactly. One of the major features of OWL (the service that powers this new History tab) is that it tracks changes in geometry so it’s possible to even show some nice animation on node/way/relation history page to show how given object has changed during its life.

Tom Chance2013年01月18日 16:30 的评论

That sounds good.

Often with these monitoring tools, I see that somebody has made some changes but when I look at the changeset I can’t really work out what they have done. Have they shifted a road 10m to the east, or just touched some nodes while making other changes in the area? Is this changeset something I should check or ignore? It’s almost impossible to tell at the moment.

ppawel2013年01月18日 16:34 的评论

Yeah, that’s the challenge I’m trying to tackle with OWL and the new History tab. The technical problem is that it’s not easy to track changes - all database schemas and, in general, data sources that we have are geared towards rendering and/or having only current data. That’s not enough when you want to analyze changes - which by definition requires you to have the “before” state and the “after” state to calculate what’s changed.

If you have any suggestions on how to improve the usefulness of this tool then please don’t hesitate to create new issues on Github:

https://github.com/ppawel/openstreetmap-website/issues

Rovastar2013年01月18日 17:07 的评论

Nice one Pawel. Glad to see my request I email you is implemented. Looking forward to this on the OSM page.

There are more and more of these global/large scale edits recently (and they are needed to correct some of what is in the database).

porjo2013年01月19日 07:35 的评论

Looks great, keep up the good work!

mcld2013年01月19日 18:39 的评论

Oh thank GOODNESS you’re doing this :) the history tab is so unhelpful because filled with worldwide edits that usually don’t even have any content in the current bounding box. Looking forward to this.

porjo2013年03月11日 20:32 的评论

Hi ppawel,

Just wondering how this is going - is it any closer to going live?

ppawel2013年03月12日 05:14 的评论

@porjo: It is moving forward but there is still a long road to production. A lot of polishing is needed and also probably a new server for OWL is needed to handle production traffic.

登录以留下评论