OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Mapping Streams in Mountain Areas

Posted by pratikyadav on 17 August 2015 in English.

Some tricks to map Streams in Mountain Area.

Mapping streams/rivers in mountain region could be very tricky. Sometimes it’s difficult to differentiate between the valley and the peaks. Other times the imagery is covered with cloud, snow or not visible due to the shadow. image Satellite Image showing parts of Gangotri National Park, India.

A few steps can be very helpful to deal with such problems.

Overview of the area

Before jumping into the task of mapping, take some time to have an overview of the whole area. This helps to have a better understanding of the region.

Switching between layers

Better to select the layer that best shows your interest features clearly. A better resolution imagery is not always the best one.

Using terrain layer

Basic knowledge contours could be very helpful while tracing rivers and streams, specially when hill shadow makes it difficult to see the riverbed. It helps to differentiate between peaks and valley. Also, you can easily find the way of the stream. Try using a combination of both terrain data and satellite imagery, works best.

Bottom to top approach

Water always flows from higher ground to lower(into the sea). Better to mark the big streams first, one which are major rivers and easily visible. Now try to upstream connecting small streams. Won’t be a good thing to leave a stream going nowhere

What not to mark?

Mountain regions are filled with landslides and very small seasonal streams. It’s very difficult to defferntiate between them. What is the correct way to map them? natural=scree,hazard_type=landslide or waterway=stream & intermittent=yes? What do you think?

image

Happy Mapping.

Location: Azad Market, Ibrahimpura, Bhopal, Huzur Tahsil, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, 462001, India
Email icon Bluesky Icon Facebook Icon LinkedIn Icon Mastodon Icon Telegram Icon X Icon

Discussion

Comment from SK53 on 17 August 2015 at 13:48

One trick I find is that if using JOSM the basic structure of the terrain tends to standout in Landsat imagery. Sketching the basic pattern of the streams and rivers at low zooms can really help to maintain orientation once refining the detail at higher zooms. I often trace ridge lines for the same reason. Using Overpass-turbo can help keep an overall prespective on ones work.

Comment from SK53 on 17 August 2015 at 13:48

One trick I find is that if using JOSM the basic structure of the terrain tends to standout in Landsat imagery. Sketching the basic pattern of the streams and rivers at low zooms can really help to maintain orientation once refining the detail at higher zooms. I often trace ridge lines for the same reason. Using Overpass-turbo can help keep an overall prespective on ones work.

Comment from yvecai on 17 August 2015 at 16:27

Also, on JOSM, you can overlay a relief layer over imagery. Tiles from opensnowmap.org are transparent, show contours lines and altitude that help to distinguish peak from valley.

Comment from Alan Trick on 17 August 2015 at 21:09

Mountain regions are filled with landslides and very small seasonal streams. It’s very difficult to differentiate between them. What is the correct way to map them?

It’s hard to tell unless you’ve been there, and even there’s no clear rules. If creek-bed is dry during the summer, I will usually go with natural=scree for the creek-bed and waterway=stream & intermittent=yes for the line where the water would go.

I usually don’t map streams unless I’ve:

  • been there myself
  • the presence of water is quite visible on from imagery (in which case, it might be a river)
  • or I have some other supporting evidence (i.e. the stream exists in government maps)

There’s a fair bit that is difficult to tell from satellite imagery. How intermittent it is is the main one, as you mentioned. It’s also possible that the stream might go under a boulder field, and be essentially “underground”.

In the Himalayas, you often have lots of loose soil, which results in very distinct angles in the landscape, which makes it easy to see where the water would go. In many places, the valley bottoms are a lot harder to see.

Comment from pratikyadav on 18 August 2015 at 09:14

@all Thank you for your suggestions.

Comment from PlaneMad on 19 August 2015 at 13:03

A nice relief shaded map used as an overlay can instantly help differentiate valleys from streams. The cyclemap layer is pretty ok for this for this purpose, but a specialized layer could really help.

Comment from BushmanK on 21 August 2015 at 05:05

If there is any digital elevation model or contours available for this area, it’s always possible to use special tools such as SAGA GIS to automatically analyze terrain and create hypothetical watershed lines and so on. Technique described above is only for cases when you have nothing like that.

Log in to leave a comment