Please have a look at the discussion in osm.org/note/4230307 and Mapillary images from the area. There is no indication visible that access is restricted, which is why I added a `fixme=*` regarding the possibility of private property and didn't modify the `access=*` directly.

As to the area being full of crops, this is seasonal regardless of the crop, the path would be accessible during certain periods of the year. There's lots of cases like this in OSM. The poor trail visibility is also recorded in OSM.

The source is the street name sign on site, as indicated in the changeset source: survey. (It's placed at where the path joins Hulststraat.)

The absence of a path name online doesn't mean it's inaccurate; in fact, OSM prioritises ground truth.

Thanks for checking on site. I removed the access restriction based on the information in note 4081153, which was the best we had, but not very clear. I see you already restored private access here, thank you.

Yes, I will. I normally fix these immediately after the import, but haven't had time yet.

The issues aren't even limited to those: also overlapping buildings occur frequently because the MapComplete tool doesn't properly detect what OSM building to replace. I'll mention it to Pieter (the dev) when I see him again, because this isn't the first time this happens.

But I'll fix it ASAP.

Hiya,

I went to check today, looks like it has moved recently, as the signage is still present on the old building. However it's operational in the new building. It's worth noting that this is actually Bierbeekstraat 2B, not 2 (confirmed by housenumber on site and GRB), so their site is wrong.

I've moved it on OSM: osm.org/node/11931123634.

Cheers,

Luna

I made this edit based on two notes, one for each place name. I did a quick Wikipedia check and it's also Anserœul on there: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anser%C5%93ul. Since misspelling “œ” as “oe” is a common spelling mistake, I changed the spelling without further checks. Is there a specific reason why it should be spelled with “oe”?

Oh, did I forget? I normally always fill in the `source` field when surveying. Sorry …

OK, thanks for the advice. Most places outside of Brussels don't have the sidewalks drawn as ways, so this information has to go on the node then.

I've tagged it as `shop=convenience`, but can't find the opening hours online. So a survey would be necessary. Putting a `fixme=*` on the POI could be an option as well.

Was inderdaad al ingevoerd door iemand anders (zie osm.org/note/4142037), maar toch bedankt voor de comment, want die persoon was één segment vergeten.

Forgot to update this but I've reported it to the city council, got a friendly reply from a lady but that doesn't fix the water tap. Will check later for possible repair if I have the time.

To be completely honest, if they didn't fix it in the last 3 years, I doubt they really care. It's not some obscure place in the city; the area around it seems well maintained. Also, I don't live in the city of Leuven, I just went there to check your note since there's a bus stop nearby :) But I'll ask someone I know who lives there to send them an email, or do it myself if/when I'm less busy with other irl stuff ...

Hi,

Yes, I try to add descriptions of changes, this time I was in a hurry because I had to leave unexpectedly. My apologies.

As for the surface tags, I think it's paving_stones in this case, but as I'm not entirely sure, I set it to paved. I pass here quite frequently so I'll try to have a look around and update it in more detail.

"cycleway=track" is verwijderd op het ganse stuk.

Ik heb het ganse stuk weg getagd met bicycle=use_sidepath. Ik neem aan dat cycleway=track mag blijven staan?

Ja want motorvoertuigen is één categorie maar er is een onderscheid tussen 1) die verschillende soorten bromfietsen en 2) andere voertuigen (auto's, vrachtwagens, tractoren)

Je hebt volledig gelijk, ik heb bij de block de toelatingen toegevoegd.