rhythmicbalancer's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
132024054 | 10 months ago | Hello, source for protect_class=3? USPAD lists IUCN category as "unassigned", except in a few portions that are category V (5). |
100923299 | 10 months ago | Hi, what's the source for IUCN value (protect_class=6) on Hoosier NF? I'm working on some adjacent areas, but the data I've found lists "Other Conservation Area" rather than giving an IUCN classification (1-6 or I-VI). Can't find a source for the infobox on Wikipedia either. |
83368835 | almost 3 years ago | I should mention my "region" is the American Midwest, I think this is pretty standard terminology in this area and the south. |
83368835 | almost 3 years ago | I agree, I never liked "man_made=drinking_fountain". The only reason I used that tag was that it had some precedent, and it's the natural term we use in my region of the US ("drinking fountain" or "water fountain"). We do NOT use "bubbler", locals would have no idea what that means, but it was the only existing tag I could find to describe the mechanism. I can't remember if JOSM suggested these tags to me, or if I found them on the wiki... A few more notes: "Water tap" is used to refer to the actual pipe that emits the water, which can also be found outside the home for garden hoses, less commonly in the kitchen or bathroom sinks (rather "faucets"). "Tap water" is the term we use for potable water that comes from such sources, rather than e.g. springs ("spring water") or wells. "Tap water" is more widely used and understood than "water tap" -- probably a regional variation. I also wasn't sure which consumers of the data might depend on this tag to properly render the feature, and so decided to err on the side of caution and include a slightly redundant tag :) |
92188120 | almost 5 years ago | Good catch! No idea how I missed the existing relation, but I deleted mine and copied new tags. Thanks! |
87848698 | almost 5 years ago | Very true, thanks for discovering this! |