My bad, thanks for the fix!

Seems this was on me, when I surveyed last year there was a sign up, must have been for one of those events

You are quite correct. Thanks for spotting!

Heyo! I've never heard Medley applied to this farm, only ever the full name, I'm interested if you have a source? Either way, I defer to your good judgement so let's change it back. You can change it back or I can if you prefer?

Hi there, and welcome to OSM! I think you accidentally connected some barriers, roads, and footpaths across Oxford in your edit. I have fixed them. Please make sure to look at any warnings your editor throws up and ensure your edits do not create phantom paths etc. Welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Please see these images for the errors brought in, if you are interested:
https://i.imgur.com/o1BHwcb.png
https://i.imgur.com/cEaUEB5.png
https://imgur.com/CR4oH5q.png

Thanks, noted and changed. Will consider in future as well.

Should this be marked as access=private? I see that aerial imagery shows what looks to be a path but I walk this area and have not seen any sort of public right of way along this field, and leaving it without an access tag may encourage routing across this field. Please correct me if I'm wrong :)

Thanks for this, I thought I'd fixed any self intersections I'd added but evidently not. I'll try and be more careful in the future!

Thanks for the fix, my hand must have slipped while typing K6!

Yep, will do, I tried to avoid changing the boundary=administrative ways but I see now that I accidentally changed Risinghurst and Sandhills. Thanks for changing it back, I'll be more careful to review that I haven't changed them in future :)

You are quite correct here, I am not in Oxford at the moment but have been meaning to survey this as it's been changed for well over a year now. The same applied to the junction of Headley Way, Marston Road, and Cherwell Drive.

We should also consider adding the traffic lights and new cycle lanes for these areas, if anyone has time for a survey :)

Ah I see you've actioned already. Many thanks.

Will do :)

Ah, maybe the door was open by accident when I went, it was years ago. Thanks!

Are you sure about this? There is an open gate for access and I've been there before. Furthermore according to this (https://www.oxfordmail.co.uk/news/10358781.momentous-day-boundary-brook-nature-park/) article, it is managed by a wildlife trust and owned by the council, so really does not seem like someone's inaccessible private land. Please correct me if I'm wrong and tell me your thoughts :)

If we are going to use a suburb for the City Centre, which is understandable as it is a well understood location in Oxford, we could consider putting it on Carfax as that feels more central to the area to me and is the traditional centre of the city. Thoughts?

Thanks! It's much appreciated, we all make mistakes :) Have a good day!

I think you may have mapped a footpath, from memory and the Bing imagery it seems the service path is a few metres to the north

I presume this is why I am seeing some tiles bugging out with empty areas showing as yellow? I guess they're still rendering since your fix. Thanks for the fix :)

Perhaps we should make Acer Walk highway=pedestrian? This would render more accurately and reflect the use of it as a pedestrian area rather than a road. Also bicycle=no as it is a pavement.

Thoughts?