OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
160400589 7 months ago

Näyttää hyvältä muutosten osalta.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160400589

160493355 7 months ago

Näyttää hyvältä muutosten osalta.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160493355

160581993 7 months ago

Hi 目立たない.

You've requested a review of your changes.

The deprecated tag (underground=yes) could've been removed.

But I can remove it now though.

Regards
rle

160767790 7 months ago

in other words, it's OK
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160767790

160767790 7 months ago

Hello, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Looks like it's tagged correctly.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160767790

160427585 7 months ago

Palautin osan muutetuista elementeistä takaisin edelliseen versioon, koska tehdyt muutokset olivat virheellisiä tai ei ole tarkistettu paikan päällä.

Huomasin myös, että changesetissä on muitakin sellaisia muutoksia palauttamieni lisäksi.

osm.org/changeset/160758012

155778502 11 months ago

And by research I mean searching the web, should probably just have written it instead :)

154383118 about 1 year ago

(has always now)

154383118 about 1 year ago

What I forgot to add to sources is that the landuse bounds are from NLS cadastral map, as always now.

154085596 about 1 year ago

Also the NLS aerial was used to align one of the driveways.

154048679 about 1 year ago

Forgot to add a source for the cadastral boundaries, so I will add a comment. The layer where they were derived is from the NLS. Sure there's the link to the layer in the imagery_used tag, but I'm still adding from where the layer originates.

153452440 about 1 year ago

According to what I have seen on ground, there's no refuge island on that crossing. Just want to tell about that.

152986488 about 1 year ago

Using Achavi, I saw that the changes seem to be reverted. The revert tools should probably do their thing on all changes on a changeset for sure though.

Thanks for your cooperation!

152986488 about 1 year ago

Have you thought about what you're going to do with the changes?

I can also take this upon myself. I'd probably revert all changes other than bin=yes. But I'll probably ask for help with this, at the community forum, for instance.

153144473 about 1 year ago

I have reverted to the previous state and added support tags for the bin nodes. Thanks for the info!

152986488 about 1 year ago

Probably all tags except highway=street_lamp and bin=yes. They seem to be copy-pasted from a specific node. I'm not sure about all nodes, but I've checked a few nodes and it seems it's like this for all nodes modified.

The added tags include traffic_sign=* tags for a direction sign to Kallahdenniemi and a cycle-footway sign. This was one thing which raised suspicion as there are no signs like these at a park near me where the edits have been made, as the location on the direction sign is in a very different place. I started to wonder, "why there is signs like this?" :D

152986488 about 1 year ago

And there is an power=* tag which seem to be usually used as main tags on nodes. There's no information about using them in combination with tag highway=street_lamp in the wiki.

152986488 about 1 year ago

Hello,
it's great that you are fixing tagging issues.
But there's one thing with the edits. There's some tags added to the edited nodes (which are all the same) which seem to not be verified on the ground.
It would be nice if the changes are reviewed (and reverted when necessary).

147585571 over 1 year ago

The data was added from the following removed ways:
osm.org/way/1104523679
osm.org/way/1104523676
osm.org/way/1104523677

147292200 over 1 year ago

Sourced from local knowledge