sourced from survey

Hei,

osaatko sanoa vielä, miksi muokatun polun kautta ei voi kulkea?

Terv.
rle

Addendum on sources:
- used also MML aerial on drawing the small track

Addendum:
The new sign locations were defined using also MML aerial.

*facepalm*

Näyttää hyvältä muutosten osalta.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160400589

Näyttää hyvältä muutosten osalta.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160493355

Hi 目立たない.

You've requested a review of your changes.

The deprecated tag (underground=yes) could've been removed.

But I can remove it now though.

Regards
rle

in other words, it's OK
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160767790

Hello, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Looks like it's tagged correctly.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160767790

Palautin osan muutetuista elementeistä takaisin edelliseen versioon, koska tehdyt muutokset olivat virheellisiä tai ei ole tarkistettu paikan päällä.

Huomasin myös, että changesetissä on muitakin sellaisia muutoksia palauttamieni lisäksi.

osm.org/changeset/160758012

And by research I mean searching the web, should probably just have written it instead :)

(has always now)

What I forgot to add to sources is that the landuse bounds are from NLS cadastral map, as always now.

Also the NLS aerial was used to align one of the driveways.

Forgot to add a source for the cadastral boundaries, so I will add a comment. The layer where they were derived is from the NLS. Sure there's the link to the layer in the imagery_used tag, but I'm still adding from where the layer originates.

According to what I have seen on ground, there's no refuge island on that crossing. Just want to tell about that.

Using Achavi, I saw that the changes seem to be reverted. The revert tools should probably do their thing on all changes on a changeset for sure though.

Thanks for your cooperation!

Have you thought about what you're going to do with the changes?

I can also take this upon myself. I'd probably revert all changes other than bin=yes. But I'll probably ask for help with this, at the community forum, for instance.

I have reverted to the previous state and added support tags for the bin nodes. Thanks for the info!