The School Street restrictions will be revoked from 2023-04-03.

These applied to Badminton Close, Leys Close, Marlborough Hill, Ranmoor Close, Ranmoor Gardens and Rugby Close

Harrow (Prescribed Routes) (School Streets) (No. 3) (Revocation) Traffic Order 2023
https://www.thegazette.co.uk/notice/4320503

Really? What's the name of this new museum?

No problem - it wasn't a mistake on your part anyway.

I suspect that when the members of the eruv boundary were consolidated into a single way, they inherited the barrier=fence and access=private tags from what were originally separate members of the boundary.

Thanks for spotting it and fixing it.

The Victoria and Albert Museum has been mapped in OpenStreetMap since 2008.

osm.org/relation/29795

Does w202984061 really need any tags? It's the sole member of a boundary relation for an eruv (which has all the relevant tags), but the area it encloses certainly isn't private.

That's great, thank you!

No need to apologise! It's absolutely fine and won't cause any problems for anyone else.

Doing the necessary "plumbing" to connect it up for routing and accessibility can be a bit tedious, but I think it's worth it on busier roads.

If it would be helpful, I could take a look at a bit of Horn Lane tomorrow and do a couple of the crossings as an example? (Note that some mappers differ in how they map crossings, so there isn't one "right" way to do anything)

Hi,

Could I ask what all these pavements are for? They're not connected to anything else via crossings, so won't actually be used by any routing software.

Separate sidewalks can be really useful for pedestrian routing on main roads with defined crossing points. Mapping the crossings as well allows a lot of accessibility features like tactile paving and lowered kerbs to be added (a survey with StreetComplete, or Bing Streetside/Mapillary imagery can be useful for this).

Separate sidewalks on long residential streets without any crossings can be a little less helpful, as it can result in a router taking the scenic route around via the nearest crossing or junction.

Hi,

Thanks for updating OpenStreetMap!

For the private car park you've added, you might want amenity=parking + parking=surface, as amenity=parking_space is for micro-mapping of individual spaces within car parks.

osm.wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking
osm.wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking_space

Hi and thanks for updating OSM.

You probably need something like oneway=yes together with oneway:bicycle=no here.

If there's a contraflow cycle lane, tagging suggestions here might help.
osm.wiki/Key:cycleway

I hope that's of some help to you.

Surely fixing the tag would have been removing the double colon, rather than simply deleting an otherwise correct tag with a lifestyle prefix?

proposed::highway=unclassified -> proposed:highway=unclassified

The mapper who added the tag is probably more familiar with ongoing changes within the London Legacy Development Corporation's area than you.

Hi Andy,

Thanks for spotting it. It should now be fixed, along with a couple of short gaps.

Rob

Have the shared cycle path sign and give way markings visible on Bing Streetside at the Southfield Road end of w165229870 been removed or replaced with a cycling prohibited sign?

Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thank you for adding details to the map.

If you're adding individual plots with allotments, it might be better to tag the plot as allotment=plot and use the ref key to store the plot number.

osm.wiki/Tag:allotments%3Dplot

If there's any way in which I can help you, please feel free to ask.

-- Rob

Please stop it. There are NO missing trunk roads in London, none of our trunk roads are called "trunk road" and we're really quite keen on not having the our main railway lines turned into roads.

Reverted in osm.org/changeset/133751915

Please stop doing this, until you know what you are doing.

Reverted osm.org/changeset/133754509

Hi BCNorwich,

Thanks, I just noticed and am about to revert them. Profile reported to DWG for vandalism (or at least a level of negligence where the distinction between the two is unimportant).

Hi, and thanks for editing OSM.

Unfortunately, the "trunk road" you mapped is a main railway line.

It is fairly unlikely that the many active mappers in London would have missed the presence of a trunk road until now.

Reverted in osm.org/changeset/133752723

Hi, and thanks for editing OSM.

Unfortunately, the "trunk road" you mapped is a main railway line.

It is fairly unlikely that the many active mappers in London would have missed the presence of a trunk road until now.

REverted in osm.org/changeset/133752553

Reverted in osm.org/changeset/133684107
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133499271