Thanks! I'm walking the last bit of the Capital Ring with friends tomorrow, so this has saved us an unnecessary detour.

Importing barriers without attempting to ascertain the barrier type or correct access tags from the available aerial and streetside imagery is unhelpful.

On the plus side, as they were not connected to highway=* ways, no routing errors resulted from incorrect access tags.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121204541

Importing barriers without attempting to ascertain the barrier type or correct access tags from the available aerial and streetside imagery is unhelpful.

On the plus side, as they were not connected to highway=* ways, no routing errors resulted from incorrect access tags.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121203718

Importing barriers without attempting to ascertain the barrier type or correct access tags from the available aerial and streetside imagery is unhelpful.

On the plus side, as they were not connected to highway=* ways, no routing errors resulted from incorrect access tags.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121230962

I have deleted a lot of these now that the TfLCID import appears to have been quietly abandoned. It will take a long time to fix the damage caused by dumping data into OSM without checking the available imagery.

Someone got *paid* for this...
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121193281

Since the access tags on this are wrong (there are TSRGD diagram 617 "no vehicles" signs either side), it is fortunate that the node for RWG072783 was not actually connected to a highway and consequently did not cause bicycle routing errors.

Would the green roof here be better tagged with green_roof=yes + roof:material=* rather than, or in addition to, roof:colour=*

osm.wiki/Key:green_roof

What does "bedzed" have to do with deleting a tree which another mapper surveyed? Has it been cut down?

Even after 3660 previous edits, you replaced the traffic_calming=choker tag surveyed and mapped by another user with the non-specific and useless to routers traffic_calming=yes? Why?

Available aerial imagery and the photographs provided by the TfL surveyors for TfLCID don't leave much ambiguity:
https://cycleassetimages.data.tfl.gov.uk/RWG271649_1.jpg
https://cycleassetimages.data.tfl.gov.uk/RWG271649_2.jpg

Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap and many thanks for adding this vegan café.

The cuisine=vegan tag isn't really used any more and has been replaced by diet:vegan=only or diet:vegan=yes (as applicable).

The diet:vegan=* (and corresponding diet:vegetarian=*) tag is used by OpenVegeMap, Veggikarte.de, StreetComplete, etc.

osm.wiki/Key:diet:vegan

Rob

Removed in osm.org/changeset/134556852

Duplicates removed in osm.org/changeset/134556703

Pity you didn't also notice that the building=yes objects which had name=House were also traced on top of buildings which had already been mapped.

Hi, welcome to OSM and thank you for adding this footpath.

It appears to be a public footpath, so if you wanted you could also add the public right of way (PRoW) tags to it, in this case:
foot=designated
designation=public_footpath
prow_ref=MR3

There's a tool to check PRoW progress here, with guidance on how to map and tag them here:
https://osm.mathmos.net/prow/progress/kent/tonbridge-malling/malling-rural/

Thanks for confirming. I've undeleted No 1 and updated its listed building data.
osm.org/way/11828338

When was Gasholder No. 1 (the Grade II Listed one) demolished?

Thanks for deleting the duplicates, but when a new mapper does this, would you mind commenting on their changeset so they know there's a problem? Two months later, @AdamLegg is still making the same mistake, probably because nobody has explained the problem.

Thanks - and keep up the good work spotting QA problems.

osm.org/changeset/134414016

Hi and thanks for updating the map!

Just a couple of comments on this changeset, which might be helpful with other buildings you add:

1) The name=* key is for the unique name of an object, not just a general description. If there isn't an appropriate tag, you can use description=*, but in this case you could use building=house. I've linked to the documentation on these below.

osm.wiki/Key:name
osm.wiki/Tag:building%3Dhouse

2) You've traced some houses on top of houses which had already mapped. Please could you delete the duplicates?

I hope that's helpful. If you need any assistance, please don't hesitate to ask.

Rob

It's awaiting inspection - https://ratings.food.gov.uk/business/en-GB/1594430

Hi,

I've changed w1126531149 across the A12 slip roads to not:highway=footway. Although it's perfectly possible and legal to cross here (and I sometimes do just that), it results in all the pedestrian routers I've tried taking the informal shortcut rather than the actual crossings.

e.g.
osm.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_foot&route=51.53066%2C-0.01232%3B51.52849%2C-0.01819#map=19/51.52958/-0.01526&layers=N