OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
135204372 over 2 years ago

If it's of any use to you, you can find less useful nodes imported from TfLCID with this Overpass query:
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1u5k

135204372 over 2 years ago

Thanks, I'm afraid that the project to use contractors to conflate TfLCID data with OSM on behalf of TfL resulted in same very low quality edits. Fortunately, they appear to have quietly abandoned it, but there's still a lot to fix.

osm.wiki/TfL_Cycling_Infrastructure_Database

135194119 over 2 years ago

Rather than using opening_hours=closed, there's the option of using a lifestyle prefix for features which are no longer open, or have been removed entirely. StreetComplete will prompt passing users to re-check some of these at intervals.

In this case, you could consider changing shop=toys to disused:shop=toys and possibly add check_date=2023-04-21

osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
osm.wiki/Key:check_date

135185390 over 2 years ago

Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for adding your business to the map.

I've moved the address and contact details from the description to the appropriate OSM tags and added the tag shop=travel_agency. This helps map users and data consumers find you.

135140253 over 2 years ago

Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Thanks for spotting that and updating the map. You asked for a review of your edit and it looks fine to me.

32781122 over 2 years ago

Subjectively, it might not be suitable for walking, or fun to walk along. However, it is not prohibited: there are no TSRGD Diagram 625.1 "Pedestrians prohibited" signs.

135082845 over 2 years ago

Please don't add fiction to the map. Fully reverted in osm.org/changeset/135087390

#DWG
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135082845

134954248 over 2 years ago

Thanks for adding it! It may take a couple of week before routing services start to use it.

134887560 over 2 years ago

No need to apologise!

I just wanted to double check, as some people will filter on vegan only in apps which use that tag. I've restored it to "only" in changeset #134916778. There's a little more information on the diet:vegan tag in the wiki page linked below.

If it's something that's of interest to you, there's also a tagging scheme for zero-waste shops.

osm.wiki/Key:diet:vegan
osm.wiki/Key:zero_waste

134887560 over 2 years ago

Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for updating the map.

Could I ask why you have changed Pipoca from diet:vegan=only to diet:vegan=yes? This implies that they also sell non-vegan products.

134863738 over 2 years ago

Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap and many thanks for updating the house details here.

You asked for a review and it looks fine to me.

The only thing which you may want to change is the addr:housenumber tag. There are several ways to tag a building with multiple house numbers (link below), but as another local mapper has already been using a comma, setting it to "29,31" may be the best choice.

osm.wiki/Addresses#Buildings_with_multiple_house_numbers

134862018 over 2 years ago

Thanks!

134843766 over 2 years ago

I'm surprised to see that the US Embassy "moat" has been replaced by a car park. When did that happen?

134857024 over 2 years ago

OpenStreetMap is a real world map, used by routing services. Please don't add imaginary features with tags you clearly do not understand.

Reverted in osm.org/changeset/134858461

134789227 over 2 years ago

The gate was already (and correctly) tagged as access=private, why change it to access=no?

You could add locked=yes if that seems appropriate.
osm.wiki/Key:locked

87928982 over 2 years ago

Unfortunately, continuous=yes + sidewalk=yes was never discussed or documented, so no data consumer would have processed these tags without a highway=crossing tag, even if they had been connected to highway=* ways.

This is fortunate, as many (or even most) of the "side road entry treatments" surveyed for TfLCID are not continuous sidewalks, but normal pedestrian crossings with a speed table and/or flush kerbs.

121239871 over 2 years ago

Importing barriers without attempting to ascertain the barrier type or correct access tags from the available aerial and streetside imagery is unhelpful. On the plus side, as they were not connected to highway=* ways, no routing errors resulted from incorrect access tags.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121239871

121238847 over 2 years ago

Importing barriers without attempting to ascertain the barrier type or correct access tags from the available aerial and streetside imagery is unhelpful. On the plus side, as they were not connected to highway=* ways, no routing errors resulted from incorrect access tags.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121238847

121232553 over 2 years ago

Importing barriers without attempting to ascertain the barrier type or correct access tags from the available aerial and streetside imagery is unhelpful. On the plus side, as they were not connected to highway=* ways, no routing errors resulted from incorrect access tags.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121232553

134765114 over 2 years ago

We enjoyed those sections a few weeks ago. Luckily we were all wearing trail or fell running shoes and got away with nothing worse than damp socks. Ideal footwear for that section of the New River Path is probably 15mm cross country spikes at the moment :-)