Christian, I typically think of the 'political' boundaries as a separate 'layer' versus the natural features. So it sounds like you're on the right track.

Ha, yes - I tried to look at the history of the relation but it failed to load on the main website. So, thanks for clarifying, probably overzealous cyclist :) But agree that if we want to show the bike version of the Colorado Trail it should be different than the hiking version. Is that something you'd be interested in? It's beyond my time resource for the near-term, or we could reach out to http://www.meetup.com/OSM-Colorado/ or the OSM-US Listserv.

This is not correct, although road quality is poor, it is still a county 'maintained' "residential" road, looking to fix.

Just FYI - the wilderness sections of the Colorado Trail are not open to Bicycles; so not sure tagging the whole relation is correct: http://www.coloradotrail.org/bike.html

Hi, in order to make sure we didn't lose good mapping; I have reverted this changeset here: osm.org/changeset/40181935

In order to restore data (we'll fix up soon), I have reverted this changeset here: osm.org/changeset/40181935

I'm not sure what you tried to accomplish here, road is still there; but is the whole section now just cycleway, or where does road end/trail begin in relation to that bridge?

Removed name=tunnel and added layer in osm.org/changeset/40181608

Removed name=tunnel, changed to highway=path as appears in osm.org/changeset/40181608

Thanks for fixing this up, I can see the changes in most recent Mapbox imagery; tried to fix it up a bit more in osm.org/changeset/40181608

Hi, I see roads in the imagery, just because it is private or not a thru-road doesn't mean it is not a road. btw, welcome to OSM visit http://learnosm.org for guides

Hi jiyach, it seems you marked large areas with the building tag; I think you want to delineate the 'neighborhood' and that is better with the landuse key. osm.wiki/Key:landuse

Understand, but it was a landuse polygon, so that's what the mapper intended it to be. Also, project 1914 as your changeset comment implies only asked for buildings, and roads if needed; so if you are doing something else, please change the comment.

This changeset has been reverted, please contact me if you have questions.

This should not have been switched from a landuse polygon to flood extent. We are looking at reverting this changeset.

Hi, I think in this changeset you created this railway bridge osm.org/way/135595390 - just to note, I'm pretty sure this railway is still in operation (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rail_transport_in_Fiji) - so, I'm going to 'put it back in operation'; just wanted to inform you in case you have more recent/local knowledge.

Hi, just a quick note - I notice this and many of your changesets don't have a comment. Please put a little description of what you did so other mappers can better understand and verify the results are what you intended. Happy Mapping!

Hi, I deleted everything in this changeset, maybe it was accidental, but obviously not existing map features. Feel free to reach out if you need help.

Thanks for this contribution and welcome to OSM! Please include a changeset comment with your edits.

Welcome to OSM, I made some further edits but am not sure looking at the TIGER overlay whether or not you intended to/should have changed the name as there are now two Platte River Courts in the area. Messaged you as well in more detail.