russdeffner's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
88403366 | almost 5 years ago | Hi rab - yes, HOT is partnering with local NGO OMDTZ on this project. They are based in Dar es Salaam and are working every day to build up the local community in Tanzania. Thanks for asking! |
88403366 | almost 5 years ago | Hi Mike, the data is generated using satellite imagery, basically MAXAR Premium, which can be several years old. Looking at this 'road' it does look like in the past it was much more of a road but still shows up kind of looking like a path in the more recent imagery (still probably a few years back). If you have local knowledge, feel free to update this to it's current use/condition. Happy Mapping! |
68333131 | over 6 years ago | Hi Emma, just noticing - lots of your roads are connected to buildings and have a weird loop at the end. Not sure how that's happening, but maybe slow down and a bit (and zoom in further) when you get to the villages/structures to make sure you are not connecting roads to buildings. Looking pretty good otherwise (classification is always difficult, check osm.wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa for more help there). Happy Mapping! |
61129356 | over 6 years ago | Hi, you created two attractions here, but did not specify what they are. Please provide more details, one appears to be in middle of jungle. |
49883862 | about 8 years ago | Hi, while reviewing the project it appears maybe you had a very offset imagery set or something, looking at Bing, DG and Mapbox imagery I don't see any buildings in this area. I have gone ahead and removed the buildings but do let me know if somehow you are using more recent imagery or otherwise how you determined there were buildings here. |
47312592 | over 8 years ago | Hi @cmos28 - your buildings look great, however, you added this driveway without tagging it highway=service. Fixed in osm.org/changeset/47327027 Also, please include a changeset comment describing what you intended to do so it's easier for other mappers, like me, to fix if you make a mistake; thanks! Happy Mapping! |
47151579 | over 8 years ago | Hi @rab - I was/am confused; is there something wrong with my changeset? Or are you just alerting me to this other changest? I see you commented there, but is there now a river missing that you previously mapped? Do we need to revert (partially) that other changeset? Looks like a very new mapper that maybe needs some constructive guidance. |
45100476 | over 8 years ago | Reverted in changeset 45114608. |
45100476 | over 8 years ago | Hi, it seems you traced roads from a high zoom level where roads existed traces much more accurately. I am exploring maybe reverting this changeset and others. Please make sure you are contributing high quality edits that are not in conflict with existing data. |
39384904 | almost 9 years ago | Christian, I typically think of the 'political' boundaries as a separate 'layer' versus the natural features. So it sounds like you're on the right track. |
40437730 | about 9 years ago | Ha, yes - I tried to look at the history of the relation but it failed to load on the main website. So, thanks for clarifying, probably overzealous cyclist :) But agree that if we want to show the bike version of the Colorado Trail it should be different than the hiking version. Is that something you'd be interested in? It's beyond my time resource for the near-term, or we could reach out to http://www.meetup.com/OSM-Colorado/ or the OSM-US Listserv. |
40406733 | about 9 years ago | This is not correct, although road quality is poor, it is still a county 'maintained' "residential" road, looking to fix. |
40437730 | about 9 years ago | Just FYI - the wilderness sections of the Colorado Trail are not open to Bicycles; so not sure tagging the whole relation is correct: http://www.coloradotrail.org/bike.html |
40169554 | about 9 years ago | Hi, in order to make sure we didn't lose good mapping; I have reverted this changeset here: osm.org/changeset/40181935 |
40180289 | about 9 years ago | In order to restore data (we'll fix up soon), I have reverted this changeset here: osm.org/changeset/40181935 |
40180243 | about 9 years ago | I'm not sure what you tried to accomplish here, road is still there; but is the whole section now just cycleway, or where does road end/trail begin in relation to that bridge? |
40170555 | about 9 years ago | Removed name=tunnel and added layer in osm.org/changeset/40181608 |
40170560 | about 9 years ago | Removed name=tunnel, changed to highway=path as appears in osm.org/changeset/40181608 |
40179711 | about 9 years ago | Thanks for fixing this up, I can see the changes in most recent Mapbox imagery; tried to fix it up a bit more in osm.org/changeset/40181608 |
40180289 | about 9 years ago | Hi, I see roads in the imagery, just because it is private or not a thru-road doesn't mean it is not a road. btw, welcome to OSM visit http://learnosm.org for guides |