@kylesey you changes are fine, fortera has a huge misunderstanding of copyright laws. I will forward this to the DWG just so they are aware of this conversation. keep editing mate! we need mappers that actually contribute to the project instead of pretending to be lawyers that have been to law school.

yeah just incase someone looks at the wrong website aswell

thanks again fixed here osm.org/changeset/146402727

yeah good find thanks, just noticed thats a brisbane hospital. ill fix it now

https://standrewshospital.com.au/

yeah thanks I realized my mistake afterwards aswell, they have all been corrected

is this fix-me issue resolved with this changset osm.org/relation/7379419

fix-me taged solved with the following changeset
osm.org/changeset/145490644

tagged amenity as office_union,

no worries thankyou

do you have it now? the sender in my inbox just came up as "DWG" and I was replying to it but I think I was replying to a message instead sorry for the confusion

just noticed that its from the email address that is saved with OSM not my personal one if that helps

Re: [Ticket#2023122210000115] Issue #28303 thats the one ive been replying to that I got the email from

I responded by replying to the email from the DWG that I received. I have not heard back since I replied either. I will copy and paste the email here if you want

DWG email

@fizzie, the discussion has moved elsewhere

page 32 under "Road function description" https://www.dit.sa.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0009/658692/MASTER_SPECIFICATION_-_PART_M11_-_UNSEALED_ROADS.pdf im not stupid, I went to uni and everything and passed.

also the other day fortera changed a residential road to secondary road because OSMcha told him too lmao, then he defends this edit but realised after a while it was wrong. so then he changed these others secondary roads to territory because he lost the argument and wanted to prove something. the roads he changed from secondary to territory was part of south australia major shipping transport route lmao. and im expected to blindly accept his "because I think it is" as fact.

page 17 shows the major traffic route which covers the trunk roads and matches the OSM wiki rules for being "major traffic roads", the secondary road network from data sa matches the definition of how secondary roads should be classified and so does the primary roads. If I need to post sources and meanings and references and have long discussions about this. We need more information and data and sources for someone to simply say its a territory road "because I think it is", right now it would be classified incorrectly as a territory road if I didnt catch it.

@ouchkars no not you bro, we were the first people to discuss the data sa road classification, I was even against it at first remember because of the trunk roads. I am talking about fortera and kurisubrooks