slice0's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
144928924 | over 1 year ago | Hi data sa lists this road as a local (residential) road which is why I made it a residential road. |
145018824 | over 1 year ago | also seems how the DWG will be reading this id like to point out that all the changeset messages that this user has made in my edits have never been correct. This user does no research before making changeset comments in my edits. |
145018824 | over 1 year ago | I have brought your comment to the attention of the DWG |
144986140 | over 1 year ago | ok that data didnt detect that gawler river road was not named correctly its not reliable information |
144986140 | over 1 year ago | I am reporting this changeset, nothing here is based on any facts |
144928924 | over 1 year ago | I have messaged the board and the DWG about this comment. |
141578158 | over 1 year ago | I have reported this comment to the DWG so its on record that youre clearly baiting here |
141578158 | over 1 year ago | im not really sure what youre saying and I dont really want to engage with you if you are trolling because I have recently been blocked by the australian DWG member for discussing a edit. Can you clearly tell me what youre trying to say... are you saying you can not travel from gorge road to montacute road via a car on corkscrew road? or are you saying it is not a secondary road or are you disputing the name of the road. Fizzie will ban me if for engaging with you if you cant get your message across properly, I think your trying to bait me here |
144721125 | over 1 year ago | I have added a note to both these small sections explaining why they are primary incase anyone was going to change them |
144721125 | over 1 year ago | i just looked into this and now I agree that it should be primary because it is part of A14 just like the small section on grange road. I will put it back to primary now |
144721125 | over 1 year ago | I understand it looks strange and I had to verify it with 2 different sources as well. |
144721125 | over 1 year ago | this is not correct, this section is secondary. the other one is also correct. that small part is primary. Source is Data SA. |
144320242 | over 1 year ago | you deleted the turn lanes? |
144117227 | over 1 year ago | i dont know bro |
144117227 | over 1 year ago | because its coming off a secondary road, i think you only use the highest classs if it a link coming off a residential road that have no links, but IDK can you link the wiki page |
143816369 | over 1 year ago | im reporting this chageset, links are determined by the road they are connecting to, if a link is going to a secondary road it is a secondary link |
125608830 | about 2 years ago | yes correct the oval is grass, its not just used as a AFL ground though, its a general use ground for afl/cricket/soccer anything else |
119191864 | over 2 years ago | what I mean is at eye level it's hard to tell just from driving through. but yeah its pretty much completed. |
119191864 | over 2 years ago | im guessing it might have been added well before construction began and during construction it was hard to tell exactly was they were building. As far as I can tell now, it has pretty much came to an end and that particular bypass road was never added, I think the council didnt like that idea because the town would lose a lot of money from people forced to go through. I am going through again tomorrow I will ask a local they seem to know. |
119191864 | over 2 years ago | I cant find any reference of this bypass, I drive through here twice a week and have been keeping up with the changes here, It make sense bypassing the whole town but I cant find a source. |