For the benefit of anyone who may be stumbling across this, I’ve asked slice0 what evidence there is that e.g. https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/165672226 should be secondary rather than tertiary.
I’ve also suggested in fairly strong terms that slice0’s attitude to the rest of the Au community needs to change (see e.g. the profile text at the time of writing and diary entries such as this one and the others.
Best Regards,
Andy (from the DWG)
If anyone wants to contact the DWG directly please email data@openstreetmap.org with a subject line of “[Ticket#2023122210000115] slice0”.
OpenStreetMap
Discussion
Comentèro de SomeoneElse lo 22 December 2023 a 21:21
For the benefit of anyone who may be stumbling across this, I’ve asked slice0 what evidence there is that e.g. https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/165672226 should be secondary rather than tertiary. I’ve also suggested in fairly strong terms that slice0’s attitude to the rest of the Au community needs to change (see e.g. the profile text at the time of writing and diary entries such as this one and the others.
Best Regards,
Andy (from the DWG)
If anyone wants to contact the DWG directly please email data@openstreetmap.org with a subject line of “[Ticket#2023122210000115] slice0”.