Hi, please, is this area
osm.org/way/163886173
realy a huge residential area?
In OSM "residential" should fit to the limits of a cluster of houses.
If it is for an administrative area like a municipality, one should use
osm.wiki/Key:admin_level
and
osm.wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative
Also many other areas similar by the coast.
Was that the case?
Best regards, Sergio.

Hi, please, is this area
osm.org/way/833865217/history
realy a huge residential area?
In OSM "residential" should fit to the limits of a cluster of houses.
If it is for an administrative area like a municipality, one should use
osm.wiki/Key:admin_level
and
osm.wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative
Also many other areas similar by the Red Sea.
Was that the case?
Best regards, Sergio.

Hi, nice to have you contributing. But please, avoid world wide changesets because they overlap local history. Rather upload in smaller local chunks. Thank you

Oi. Você tem certeza que estas vias principais são "access=destination":
osm.org/way/744742732
osm.org/way/791672553
uma vez que continuam serra abaixo até vilarejo, me parecem públicas; e neste caso, unclassified, não service.
Sim?

Why did you delete a valid wikipedia tag without replacing it for another one valid? osm.org/way/292171963/history

Why you've still not started to map?

Aquele "Parque Nacional" citado cf. MMA, propriamente dito, no OSM, era esta relação, que agora não existe mais também: osm.org/relation/2525338/history

O "Parque", propriamente dito, é este:
http://sistemas.mma.gov.br/portalcnuc/rel/index.php?fuseaction=portal.exibeUc&idUc=175

http://mapas.mma.gov.br/i3geo/mma/openlayers.htm?rch0rd51vphjkebfmn8nich4i3

Por que foi removido o Pantanal propriamente dito, que são as áreas de wetlands
osm.org/relation/7414258/history?

O que restou
osm.org/relation/10215897
não é o Pantanal, mas apenas o "Parque Nacional do Pantanal Matogrossense", que é uma ínfima pedaço do Pantanal.

Você fala em remover imprecisão, mas:
O contorno podia não ser 100% preciso, pois obtido de resolução mais baixa.
Não existe 100% de precisão geométrica em mapas.
Se for imprecisão da geometria, só se remove geometria imprecisa se for adicionar outra mais precisa; caso contrário se está removendo a informação toda, não uma imprecisão.

Sim?

Olá,
que me recordo foi daqui:

Case Report Open Access
"Groundwater Management in the 300 bce-1100ce Pre-Columbian City of Tiwanaku (Bolivia)"

https://www.omicsonline.org/open-access/groundwater-management-in-the-300-bce-1100ce-pre-columbian-city-of-tiwanaku-bolivia-2157-7587.1000168.php?aid=26266
(ver PDF)

https://www.omicsonline.org/open-access/groundwater-management-in-the-300-bce-1100ce-pre-columbian-city-of-tiwanaku-bolivia-2157-7587.1000168.pdf

"New discoveries and perspectives on water management at 300 Bc-Ad 1100 tiwanaku’s urban center (bolivia)"
https://medcraveonline.com/MOJCE/new-discoveries-and-perspectives-on-water-management-at-300-bc-ad-1100-tiwanakursquos-urban-center-bolivia.html

Hi, thanks, one note: tracks going to houses are always at least "highway=service" such as osm.org/way/750640201 .

Hi. Is this point actual or historical? OSM is just for actual elements.

Já corrigi.

A imagem é que deve estar deslocada, cerca de 150m p/NW.
Você pode recolocar o ponto no lugar?

Olá.
Por que você deslocou o ponto do pico do Monte Roraima?(osm.org/node/3773469438/history)
Segundo coordenadas do IBGE (http://www.bdg.ibge.gov.br/bdg/pdf/relatorio.asp?L1=90128) era onde estava antes.
E no mesmo documento diz que nestas coordenadas é onde realmente está o "marco da tríplice fronteira (Brasil - Guiana - Venezuela)."
?

Ah ok muchas gracias. Sérgio

Hola, bueno trabajo, pero parece que hay un río desplazado por el nodo de la ciudad de Purús en
osm.org/node/1237320319
Puedes arreglarlo?

Who did wrong, to correct?
Where is this the other stretch of that long river that was mapped?
osm.org/way/384245084
Much better think twice before simply deleting and not replacing what was there before. Right?

Will you add that previous extension? Preserving its history of editions, as ugood practice? It's not hard to do.

Ok for MAXAR, it's being provided by default in JOSM by now.

Another point:
MAXAR is a prived company that provide satellite image.

Digital Globe, which was accquired by MAXAR, provided license for OSM:

osm.wiki/DigitalGlobe#Legal_permissions

But:
there's no DG anymore.
MAXAR is the new owner.

Does OSM have such explicit accordance of MAXAR to use images for mapping under OSM's conditions? If not, you can't use MAXAR's data nor images.