5,000 changesets and doesn't square buildings with the "Q" key when making them. Please do so

Another question - why are your changeset descriptions worded so weirdly?

No idea if this will reach you but don't make diary entries like that, it's considered spam

changeset reverted

These are all manually reviewed, right?

Don't be so rude please

Hi! You seem to be an organization. Please check this out - https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

Why were these paths deleted?

They're actually named "abandon building", "my house", and "bahamas national trust/restaurant"? Those all seem like highly suspect names for buildings.

In 5 years when you rediscover this site as a more mature person, I hope you still find this funny.

This changeset has been reverted because it has deleted valid data.

This changeset has been reverted because it has deleted valid data.

This changeset has been reverted because it has deleted valid data.

OSM is used for many things, not just one navigation app. The app overloading is the app's problem, not my problem or the site's problem. Those are valid track roads and their usage is consistent with what track roads are supposed to be used for.

Why did you delete these track roads?

Thanks for telling me!

Hi! Try squaring buildings with the "q" key. They look a lot nicer. I've done the example here for you.

Please use more descriptive changeset comments.

Ве молиме користете повеќе описни коментари за промените.

~snoozingnewt

Another tip - it's common practice to square buildings you make using the "Q" key, and to not glue (connect) buildings with each other, so keep an eye out for that! I edited the buildings you added in this changeset as an example.

This is... not a good way to inform the russian people that their leader is like Hitler. It is the opposite of a good way. The good way is to start mapping in countries nearby Poland to help refugees.

Nice to meet you! Saw your work in Centralia - three questions.

1. Why are you making the trees overlap the buildings? OSM is a map of what's on the ground, not what you can see from satellite imagery. I doubt the building suddenly disappears under the cover of a tree.

2. Why are individual trees mapped as areas? They should be mapped as nodes. natural=wood is used for entire forests.

3. Specifically for the washington lawn cemetery, what's up with that? Does the cemetery not exist when there's tree cover? That does not look like the on-the-ground shape.

Thanks,
snoozingnewt