Wait, are all five of those water bodies called Python Lake? If so, you should put them into a relation

These buildings are low quality

Hey, two years late but can you explain the rationale for changing the road classifications in this specific area? It looks really weird, especially using the humanitarian layer

Where are you getting this data from?

These building outlines seem inaccurate, what method are you using to draw them?

JOSM reverter plugin is the best bet, I can do it for you (or you can go and manually find the issue yourself and fix it)

It seems like you could have broken the relation here

Congrats!

Hi, can you please use more descriptive changeset comments?

Your definition was just the definition of driveway, which is no different than just using service=driveway versus service=driveway2. Why not use driveway? I still don’t understand how there is any meaningful difference

If it has no meaning or you don’t know one then it is a nonsense tag. If i add h=oefotprkf to 489 reservoirs across the US and someone automatically removes all of them I wouldn’t consider that to be against the rules.

Can you tell me what driveway2 is supposed to mean then?

Thanks for the feedback!

I'm pretty sure individual trees should not be mapped as forest

you're not outsmarting anyone

If something is tagged as forest and it isn't forest, there are two fixes, both of which are not deleting the forest. One is to modify the forest boundary. If the forest encompasses the entire area, then create a multipolygon relation by selecting both and pressing the c button on iD, which I just did to the aforementioned meadow + ponds.

That doesn't justify deleting it, unless the time spent fixing it would be longer than the time spent remaking it. It's more accurate than no forest cover at all and can be easily fixed

osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Oh yeah, that makes sense if it's on a phone.

Hey, can you try to use more descriptive changeset comments?