spiregrain's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
129364203 | almost 2 years ago | Is this now the boundary of the ULEZ? (rather than osm.org/relation/9418858 )? |
140217515 | almost 2 years ago | Second point - way 1201024526 is visible on Bing imagery, but in more recent imagery it seems to have been replaced by two smaller buildings - can you have a look? |
140217515 | almost 2 years ago | Hi there. So you think the former church here is still recognisable as a church building? If so do you think it could/should be tagged as building=church and building:use=apartments? |
138892017 | almost 2 years ago | I visited today and found it to be impassible due to brambles at the top. Might be OK again in the winter. |
138892017 | about 2 years ago | Hi there - has something changed here recently to remove or block this path? It was definitely there and in regular use last time I checked... thought it is/was unsurfaced and unofficial. |
132630672 | about 2 years ago | The Mapillary imagery is about right, you can see the menswear shop and (if you squint a bit) the accountants next door. |
132630672 | about 2 years ago | The accountant is next door to the north, I think I must have tried to copy the source:addr:housenumber from there and copied the office= too. |
132630672 | about 2 years ago | It's not - It's remains a clothes shop, or did last time I visited. Too much copying and pasting on my part! |
138422748 | about 2 years ago | I edited that way only *this morning* to add foot=yes (my android app of choice has a hard time routing on unusual highway times without explicit foot=yes). I didn't notice access=yes was already set - it's gone now. |
120325849 | about 2 years ago | Is the substation at w1055845442 really called "Little Chef"? |
90022265 | about 2 years ago | I too have recently walked the length on Ray Lane (Golf Club, East Newhall Farm Cottage, East Newhall, and on to Wrabness Road), and didn't see any indication that it was private for pedestrians. From memory, there was an indication at the B1352 end that it's not suitable for HGVs or something like that. So I'd be inclined to put foot=yes on it. |
134887554 | over 2 years ago | Thanks for tidying this up! |
134765114 | over 2 years ago | Bring boots when you get to w623666728, which has the muddiest section of the whole ring (near Seven Sisters Road). Or detour via Eade Road. The the maze of fields round w26555603 (Gotford's Hill) are also difficult with shoetype footwear at the moment. |
134765114 | over 2 years ago | Hah! Reader, I took that detour (from the north). The bit round the Beckton Radar Mast is closed off. But the bit over the lock-gate at Lockside Way has a fence that's easy to squeeze past - then you can get all the way round "Albert Island" to find that King George V lock is lying on the bank in bits. We had to trek all the way back to Upper Dock Walk. But we did the whole Capital Ring in 4 days, and that was the only significant problem. |
131197870 | over 2 years ago | Thanks for looking at it. I've amended it on changeset 134176094. I like to use the school tracker here: https://osm.mathmos.net/schools/progress/BT/ to keep on top of changes to UK schools as they open / close / get mapped. So it's easy to spot amenity=school objects that likely aren't actually schools. |
131197870 | over 2 years ago | is "Derryview Family and Children's Centre" a school, or is it an amenity=kindergarten or something else? |
130985712 | over 2 years ago | Is *this* in current use as a school? |
130985699 | over 2 years ago | Is this school in use as a school? |
133690460 | over 2 years ago | Thanks Mate! I just couldn't figure it out. I couple of years ago I uploaded a set where many houses where tagged tainted=yes, which might have surprised the residents. Like your relation, it was intended to be for my own use only! (Tainted by association with inadmissible address data sources in case you were wondering) |
133690460 | over 2 years ago | What's this all about? There seem to be a lot more objects in r15601608 than might be expected? And that relation has no tags. Noticed it while looking at r15601608. |