Hello PT-53,
Thanks for checking into my edits. I have added highway=service, as the segment leads to multiple entities. I have now changed the highway classification to driveway. Please find the changeset (106495482) with suggested modifications. Happy to learn from you. Have a good day!

Regards,
Srinatpa.

Hi Limes11,

Thanks for validating our edits. We have made this edit partially based on the driver feedback and avaialble resources. Please go through the forum https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=68933 for detailed understanding of the private imagery we are utilizing. Happy to contribute to the OSM and learn from the community

Thanks,
Srinatpa.

Comments correction : Added Maxweight for Uhlandstraße based on sign board in street view

Hi Trigpoint,

Thanks for the reply. We are checking for multiple resources to improve our edit quality. In our analysis, we came across some pattern of addition of path by the senior community members.( PFB Bollard data). we have improvised the methodology to addition of notes, so that only the edits aligning with the ground data will be reflected. It can be helpful if the local knowledge can improve our edits.We are continuously thriving to improve our edit quality from the community suggestions.

osm.org/node/6221560108
osm.org/node/5889465667
osm.org/node/6205365187
osm.org/node/6144316492
osm.org/node/6395153941
osm.org/node/7237961278
osm.org/node/3726813564
osm.org/node/6144313089
osm.org/node/5709955196
osm.org/node/1960430087
osm.org/node/5408177013
osm.org/node/5921642827
osm.org/node/671697417
osm.org/node/339857102
osm.org/node/339857102
osm.org/node/6157768468
osm.org/node/6157768468
osm.org/node/6157768468
osm.org/node/5204488421
osm.org/node/5204488421
osm.org/node/5204488421
openstreetmap.org/node/252549741
osm.org/node/4042500340
osm.org/node/5320337906

Thanks,
Srinatpa.

Hi all,

Thanks for looking into our edits. We have added a footpath based on the separation in OS open data street view and the previous suggestions from the community. We left a note, so that the local mapper can improve our edits. Please find the suggestions from the changeset osm.org/changeset/81002259 .We understood the importance of cycle path from this page osm.wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions .We are adding footpath when there is no street side and presence of separation in OS openstreet data. Please let me know in case of any further suggestions. Always happy to learn from community.

Thanks,
Srinatpa.

Hi Mike Baggaley,

Thanks for checking into our edit. Our edits are partially based on the GPS traces of our delivery partner. We will take this as a learning from the community and make sure it will be improving our editing quality.

Regards,
Srinatpa.

Hi NDM,

Thanks for your response. As mentioned in our wiki, we cannot share the private imagery publicly but it has the most recent imagery coverage (in few cases even a month old images). As per our ground survey (GPS traces of our driver) and latest satellite imagery proof, your edit is contradicting on ground reality. This construction is completed on April, 2019 and since May, 2019 the road is in usage by local residents. Since you are the local community member, we value your contribution and leave the edit for your judgment. In future, if you pass through this location, please do fix it back in OSM as per ground reality. Looking forward for more learnings from you.

Regards,
Srinatpa

Hi Ndm,

Thanks for checking into our edits. The edit was based on Private maxar imagery dated "2019-11-16". The modified edit is creating road duplication, kindly verify the edit.

Regards,
Srinatpa.

Hi ndm,

Thanks for taking the time to review my edit. We are still working on the addition of paths data in OSM with valid resources. Please find the changeset for suggested modifications(81663115). Please let me know in case any further edits required.

Thanks & Regards,
Srinatpa

Hi TheEditor101,

Thanks for checking my edits. This edit is partially based on the GPS traces of our delivery partner. Always happy to improve OSM quality.

Regards,
Srinatpa.

Hi Chris Fleming,

Thanks for the confirmation on changeset 75222860 where I added directions to Lindsay’s Wynd Road. About Forth Gardens and Hill View roads, we added the directions as per EarthWatch aerial imagery where lane markings are visible and added source . Please confirm the changeset 75451674. Please let us know in case if it is not a one-way as per the local knowledge. Always happy to learn from the community.

Regards,
Srinatpa

Hi Chris Fleming,

Thanks for looking into my edit.The directions to the lane are added on basis the lane markings that are visible aerially in earth watch. Didn't add it in source which is completely my mistake.So, added the source for the edit.Please revert the edit if it is not a one-way as per the local knowledge.Always happy to learn from the community.

Thanks,
Srinatpa

Hi user_5359,

Thank you for looking into my edit. The access tag=designated for the (osm.org/way/37005050) was done 10 years ago. Due to a lack of proof, I did not change the access tag of the segment. Please let me know in case you want me to modify this edit. Looking forward to learn from the community.

Regards,
Srinatpa

Hi,

Thank you for bringing this to our notice. We usually edit only in a smaller area. This might have occurred due to some systemic/technical issue where two edits from different areas must have recorded into one changeset.

Regards,
Srinatpa

Due to some technical issues the above mentioned comment was incomplete. Below is the actual comment " The motor_vehicle tag was added based on our delivery partner GPS traces which is verified with the vehicles present in the satellite imagery. However, post the community feedback, we have changed our interpretation of motor vehicle access to mean the legal right of access. We are now fully aligned with the community’s view of not adding "motor_vehicle=yes" tag without evidence suggesting the legal right of access to the road. Thus, reverting the access tag changes."

Due to some technical issues the above mentioned comment was incomplete. Below is the actual comment " The motor_vehicle tag was added based on our delivery partner GPS traces which is verified with the vehicles present in the satellite imagery. However, post the community feedback, we have changed our interpretation of motor vehicle access to mean the legal right of access. We are now fully aligned with the community’s view of not adding "motor_vehicle=yes" tag without evidence suggesting the legal right of access to the road. Thus, reverting the access tag changes."

Due to some technical issues the above mentioned comment was incomplete. Below is the actual comment " The motor_vehicle tag was added based on our delivery partner GPS traces which is verified with the vehicles present in the satellite imagery. However, post the community feedback, we have changed our interpretation of motor vehicle access to mean the legal right of access. We are now fully aligned with the community’s view of not adding "motor_vehicle=yes" tag without evidence suggesting the legal right of access to the road. Thus, reverting the access tag changes."

Due to some technical issues the above mentioned comment was incomplete. Below is the actual comment " The motor_vehicle tag was added based on our delivery partner GPS traces which is verified with the vehicles present in the satellite imagery. However, post the community feedback, we have changed our interpretation of motor vehicle access to mean the legal right of access. We are now fully aligned with the community’s view of not adding "motor_vehicle=yes" tag without evidence suggesting the legal right of access to the road. Thus, reverting the access tag changes."

Due to some technical issues the above mentioned comment was incomplete. Below is the actual comment " The motor_vehicle tag was added based on our delivery partner GPS traces which is verified with the vehicles present in the satellite imagery. However, post the community feedback, we have changed our interpretation of motor vehicle access to mean the legal right of access. We are now fully aligned with the community’s view of not adding "motor_vehicle=yes" tag without evidence suggesting the legal right of access to the road. Thus, reverting the access tag changes."