OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
149772070 over 1 year ago

Yes, this changeset comment is not the best way to discuss the tagging.
It seems that the wiki has also no established solution for such nested POI. The other way round exists as well. You paid already a basic fee, but you have to pay extra for something. The later case is correct with a fee=yes, but can't be distinguished with this case here where the museum is included in the park entrance fee. Maybe asking in the forum to get some sort of common agreement on a tagging.

149772070 over 1 year ago

Does Museum cost really an extra fee, additional to garden entrance? If not, tag sounds not right. As you are only able to enter via garden, it's free to enter it then.

10697748 over 1 year ago

Thank you for your time to clean up the data in Thailand.

Please remove it. "fixme" tags on data elements are not that relevant in OSM at all. Check if it looks roughly correct and if no further hint is available what to fix, then remove the tag.

As you have noticed, this way was created more than 12 years ago. Besides that I do not remember such details after 700k of edits and this long time, adding "fixme" tags is something I usually do not do (at least not without leaving a more detailed note). I believe this tag was existent on a previous version and was taken over when splitting the way or in other ways adjusting to the back then updated available imagery.

118867122 over 2 years ago

These signs indicate maxweight: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Thailand_road_sign_%E0%B8%9A-33.svg

128077659 over 2 years ago

I removed maxspeed tagged on way 1107067205. I am very certain that 12 is not right. Please check your sources again. Please pay attention to not confuse weight limits with speed limits, see: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Thailand_road_sign_%E0%B8%9A-33.svg

20401381 over 2 years ago

It was certainly a shop where you could use the internet for money. I do not know what was the tagging style in use ten years ago. I guess presets pointed to the shop key.

I reviewed the area on Mapillary imagery which is plenty available in this area. The shop is gone, so I removed it.

112641972 almost 4 years ago

somewhere around the 18th the relation 2108121 (malaysia boundary) was broken and disappeared from region extract. I am uncertain which specific edit broke it. I found two ways without admin level and a mysterious josm warning about subare which should actually be fine. Maybe you have an idea what could have happened as you edited quite a bit.

76028591 about 4 years ago

node 6904655056
name:en=Som Yot Home Mart
name=สมยศโฮมมาร์ท
What kind of shop is this? Is it a doityourself similar to HomePro?

107439308 about 4 years ago

thanks for the quick response on this one. I noticed broken boundary last night, but was busy with work for living during the day. Pleasant surprise to see it already fixed.

90966094 about 4 years ago

that over-detail mapping does not align with recent imagery. I propose that you simplify it into a simple customer parking node

105886981 about 4 years ago

I removed that section. This is just not land used for religious purposes. I am uncertain regarding their huge parking spaces. Could it be that the north-east part is used for the school, like for teacher parking?

102364295 about 4 years ago

not residential. Overlaps existing way. way 926444800

102515244 about 4 years ago

there are only fields. Not residential. way 927422745

102364332 about 4 years ago

track. unconnected. way 926445048

102438466 about 4 years ago

track, not major highway. Also not connected. way 926929822

102364234 about 4 years ago

do not invent major highways in the middle of rice fields way 926444183

102835728 about 4 years ago

do not add imaginary stream

102763562 about 4 years ago

do not add imagery stream all over the place way 929471022

102762703 about 4 years ago

do not imaginary stream way 929463884

102835724 about 4 years ago

do not add imaginary stream way 929987628