way 838534871 is a service road to the hospital, not a tertiary highway. I fixed it for you.

dear #Kaart, please do not re-tag paved residential roads into tertiary dirt roads. Especially not without proper survey. way 251492110

way 712591996 with 1233 floors nearby is also impressive.

problem still visible in bing maps: https://www.bing.com/maps?osid=a70eec59-f17b-4f79-805a-517b8faa9bb7&cp=-37.714705~144.965212&lvl=19&v=2&sV=2&form=S00027

also way 712592055 suffered from the same problem.

Why did you add noname=yes for the market node? You can find the sign road-facing: https://www.google.com/maps/@15.2339805,104.8550059,3a,15y,76.12h,97.11t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sHUdprmyrakL7abwJ9m2_EA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656

these roads and all others in this area had been imported from a badly aligned imagery. They are all shifted by approximately 60 meters. Please re-visit this area and re-align with correct imagery.

node 7688192100
โรงพยาบาลสรรพสิทธิประสงค์

looks like a duplicate to already existing hospital nearby node 3326559851
โรงพยาบาลสรรพสิทธิประสงค์

STOP abusing OSM as a place to document whatever results you consider important. OSM is not the place for it.

Please document import. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=70103

node 6226110359: a crossing in the middle of a field? are you kidding?

please stop doing phantasy mapping of nonexisting major highways

the road is not called "unpaved service road". Please add this to the correct tags.

This is a serious project. Please stop adding non-existing "slipway" or aerialway platter in a village.

หมู่ที่ 8 not on village sign. We also tag on place=village and not on landuse

please connect new roads to existing ones and not simply end the road nearby without connection

please make sure new roads are connected to the existing ones

changing a track into a secondary is unjustified here. I assume it was by mistake and fixed it, but please be more cautious when modifying existing streets.

please use English language and not Morse code for your comments.

We are a community and like to know what and why you mapped here. It is not helpful that you "editied many things". Try to give us a hint what was broken and why you modified it. Especially with large changes like these covering many Elements.

You are adding here details down to a very high resolution. Unfortunately the available imagery is not well suitable for this detail. While on Esri the parking lots roughly match what you mapped, they don't on other imagery sources.
Be aware that especially the imagery from satellites often has an offset and other distortions. In other parts of the world exists high resolution ortho-photos with sub-10cm resolution. These might allow such kind of detail. With the the 60+cm resolution available here the mapped data might be discarded once it turns out to be off.

Are you trying to map in a way it "looks nice" on the rendered map? Please try not to do this. There are many different map styles in use. And what you think looks nice on one might look horrible on another.

why have you moved the school? I am quite certain the school is closer to the original coordinates, then where you placed it.