way 687550096 is tagged as unspecific "road" type. It looks like a track. If you are uncertain what it is, better not map at all. I changed to track based on aerial.

way 687549501 is at most an agricultural track, not a primary highway. I repaired it for you. In the future, please pay more attention to your tagging.

Hello, you classified way 678210128 as a secondary highway, even it is much closer to an agriculture track. I fixed that for you. Please be more careful when mapping in the future. Also your buildings lack on the geometry precision. Please use the tools of the editor to draw orthogonal buildings. It would be great if you could revisit this area and fix your edits.

Dear Kaart, please only change the classification of highways in case you have a good source. For a tertiary we usually expect a highway reference like a four digit classification. Reverting the change. way 238460834

please do not use OSM for testing purposes. Way 858964360 is no tertiary highway.

why are you re-tagging a residential into living_street? You had been part of the thread in which we decided, that due to the missing legal concept of living_streets in Thailand we are not using this. speed limits are always tagged when signed, access tags describe it in case the road is not open to the general public. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=19316

you are re-tagging unpaved tracks into tertiary roads. Why? way 794576719 You also re-tagged surrounding roads. Your change-set comment is not helpful. Please give other mappers more hints about why you are doing such drastic changes and what source it is based on.

you removed all tagging on way 552240191. Why? Tagging as lake looks reasonable...

do not add invented features. reverting 552240187

are you trying to cheat pokemon? way 764548751 covers houses and more. it is not a park. Similar way 764548752 which is the bus terminal. Please do not game with OSM, otherwise we will get you blocked.

I personally would not map individual patches of farmland. I think this level of detail is a bit excessive at the current time. way 854082331 is on maxar imagery not a water feature but looks like a dried out pond. So you could add additional tags like pond and maybe some tagging indicating that water is only seasonal. On way 854082335 you added source tags. This is obsolete. Also, as you stated "local knowledge", please add the name of the temple. If you modify a facebook import and confirm it is reasonable, you could remove the import=yes tagging from it.way 854082325 looks more like a weir on aerial, but as you stated local knowledge you might have seen it and can confirm that it is made from rock/soil. way 854082286 has much larger dimensions. Check out maxar. Also water/pond might be a more suitable tagging. In general your tagging looks good.

you added additional tags to geometries not corresponding to the situation on the ground/aerial. For example way 662952977 is not reflecting the shape of the building. How to proceed with these shapes? If you want to keep the building=yes, at least remove the area=yes. I cleaned up other parts, but those had been untagged, where you have added a partially valid tagging here.

May' 19 situation: https://www.google.com/maps/@17.0463448,100.2168566,3a,75y,123.81h,73.38t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sBHt72AF-pEsoQQdellqaKQ!2e0!5s20140201T000000!7i16384!8i8192

how confident are you that the data source regarding tertiary 4049 is correct? On all aerial sources it still looks like an agricultural track. Also lots of bridges are missing. Could it be that this road is or was some planned extensions which did not (yet) make it? I feel we should only tag existing tertiary roads as such. If it is still planned, please use the construction tag. way 797038705

while whether shelters are technically a sort of building, what purpose does it serve to map them for fighting malaria? Maybe consider tagging them appropriately? example way 690768512
please also make sure you get the geometry right.

please draw building outlines with proper shapes. your editor has a function to do this. please use your editor accordingly. Please re-visit this area and fix your edits, for example way 696327722

please use tags on elements according to their documented meaning. maxspeed documents a signed legal speed limit, not what you consider is appropriate. Also a ford has a very specific meaning. Similar a living_street for which the legal equivalent is not existing in Thailand. The road is a simple residential. way 721808228

way 838864874 is tagged as ford. given the surrounding, this is quite unlikely. Other ways nearby have the same wrong tagging. Also you did not connect the ways to the road network.
We also do not create "areas" to label village. Please use the established and documented tags from the wiki. If you need assistance, please contact experienced mappers, for example in the forum. Please also take care of warnings displayed by your editor. It did warn you about the problems before you submitted.

you did overdraw existing shapes. Also your geometries has nothing to do with reality. use editor properly. Reverting this changeset,

you did overdraw existing shapes. Also your geometries has nothing to do with reality. use editor properly. Reverting this changeset,