also deleted way 529718916

You have (at least) those two roads newly created on top of existing highways. I am deleting them now. Please double check for existing roads before uploading.

way 529718919
way 529718917

sorry, comment belonged to one changeset earlier. Changeset: 45285727
Thanks for fixing bad tagging. That maps.me user had a near 100% fail rate with the tagging...

openstreetmap is a public geo database. We collect facts. Please stop adding your noted into name-tags...

openstreetmap is a public geo database. We collect facts. Please stop adding your noted into name-tags...

Can you please check the spelling of the monument? It does not render correctly. The unicode string looks broken. Seems you have broken characters at the beginning and in the end.

Do not abuse the name tag for comments. "Entrance fee to pass" is not the name of this feature. I removed it and replaced it by fee=yes which is the correct way to indicate this.

Sorry that you did not get it the first time. What you are doing is wrong!

The name tag is only for the official name of a feature. It is not meant for you to express your frustration about paying an entrance fee to whatever attraction it is.

In addition to that you uploaded duplicate data over existing one. The following node (exactly same location) contains all the relevant information of your edit minus your nonsense name tag:
osm.org/node/1700555516

Until it was recently moved by a different user by 7 meters it was also at exactly the same location at where your duplicate node has been which I had to fix for you.

"Entrance fee 100 Baht" is certainly not the name of it. So you abuse the tagging. Please don't do that. I understand your frustration about having to pay a fee. Still: abusing name tags to have this highlighted on the map is not appropriate.

You did duplicate geometry so I fixed it. In addition the node you refer to had inappropriate tagging on it there is an entrance fee for the national park, not for the lift gate. Park already has fee=yes.

Crazy Horse seems to be a common name for the rocks. On that "alternative" map there are multiple reviews mentioning this (search for "Crazy Horse Buttress"). Maybe keep it as "alt_name:en"?

I did only fix the tagging of the data. With the wrong format the data can not be evaluated.
Shop is still there. Also I did not change the name. Thanks for cross-checking.

I didn't add the name, but just turn lanes to give a nice example on how it can be modeled.

Regarding the name: Hard to tell whether it is official. If I had to guess I would say it is not the official name, but colloquial name. Sort of "loc_name". The highway 118 (which would be the official "name", is called Chiang Mai-Chiang Rai road, because it is the way you typically take heading to Chiang Rai.

I have no problem getting rid of that thing as it is more of a description than a name.

why are you adding no-u-turn relations on every junction? This doesn't make much sense. Also doing a cross-check with streetview shows no such restriction. Please explain why are you adding this massive amount of restrictions.

you did not tag your ways. Like this they won't show up. In case they are supposed to be buildings: In Thailand houses are typically build with walls having right angles. Your ways have random shapes.

which provider did you use for DigitalGlobe? Was it Bing? so best to document it in this way. Digital Globe sells their imagery to different customers. Only a few of them allowed us to use it for OSM tracing.

some of your buildings overlap

some of your buildings overlap.

Are you involved with Facebook? Please document this on your user page.

Are you related to Facebook? Please document this on your user page.