stephankn's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
55776925 | over 7 years ago | In English there are spaces between words. Use Thai script in "name" and English/RTGS in "name:en" |
56341699 | over 7 years ago | Hello and welcome to OSM.
|
55881406 | over 7 years ago | Please do not use abbreviations for names. It is impossible for an algorithm to expand these in all conditions while it is simple to shorten them by software. So write "Road" instead of "Rd." |
55865039 | over 7 years ago | Please also avoid using the tag highway=unclassified. This does not mean that you don't know the classification. It is actually a way to mark roads which for example connect villages to the main highway network but have not yet received a classification (from DRR, like the 4 digit numbers) |
55865039 | over 7 years ago | As mentioned in another comment, please make sure to use correct tags. Otherwise data consumers can't make sense of your contributions. Worst case it won't be considered at all. I fixed residential roads tagged as highway=road instead of highway=residential. Also parking isles also have their own tagging. |
56206267 | over 7 years ago | Welcome to OSM.
Please feel free to check out the forum in case you have questions regarding how to best tag things in OSM. |
55868470 | over 7 years ago | way 555897421:
|
56092090 | over 7 years ago | what are you doing? First you deleted hundreds of way, and now adding them from scratch? |
55851095 | over 7 years ago | A nice first edit. Check out the different imagery layers you can use. You will notice that some offer details others don't. Also take note that sometimes the roads look shifted on different layers. Best is to compare the imagery position with GPS traces available and choose the best fitting one. Just as a hint: don't re-align existing roads unless you are absolutely certain about the better alignment. (don't worry, you didn't do). With your mapping I have a question: You added a highway=residential with an angle. There is another road continuing to the east. I added this now. Could it be, that the north-south section is a different soi? Maybe it even has a name? You could re-visit your addition and add a name to it. We tag the name in Thai script in "name". The RTGS with Latin characters would be in "name:en". |
55851203 | over 7 years ago | Hello,
|
55600154 | over 7 years ago | what happened here? node 4990576441 a huge gap in a major highway. I have re-connected the ways based on aerial imagery to have a routable network again... |
55763360 | over 7 years ago | Hello and welcome to OSM Thailand. way 555900975: Please explain what you mean with oneway=reversible. I know that sometimes entry to a road from one side gets blocked, eg during busy hours. But infrequently reversind the one-way? With this being in Bangkok nothing is impossible, but please clarify. Same for way 402310959
way 555900976: In Thailand we don't have the legal concept of a living_street. It's a highway=residential. Also adding all those special sub-tags like horse, etc is not necessary and is typically only added if it differs from the norm. Same for way 555900977. In general, please make sure that your ways are connected to each other, otherwise routing is not possible. Also keep roads with are not needed to be separated for mapping reasons connected together. Gap at node 3585868101. |
53851714 | over 7 years ago | It sounded like an import, so I wondered what source was used and whether it would also contain data for Thailand. Rendering of all those unnamed peaks is a bit weird, but this is a different story. Can you document on how to get the AMS maps on the main page of Laos together with other data sources? osm.wiki/WikiProject_Laos Where can these maps be obtained from? is this complete? Are there instructions somewhere on how to adjust projection and alignment and how to use as an imagery layer? I probably also ask directly Adrian for How-To details.
For the large number of peaks, probably only document where they are from and what the source was in case others wonder about it as well. |
55538728 | over 7 years ago | I notice that your added POI line up very well with the few POI listed on google maps. Might be coincidence. But please be aware, that it is NOT allowed to copy details from google maps to OSM. We want to have the features verified on the ground. This is what makes OSM better than google. The features are actually verified (location and existence) and not automatically placed by some algorithm. |
55538728 | over 7 years ago | node 5346112264
|
55538728 | over 7 years ago | node 5346112262
|
55538728 | over 7 years ago | way 553888009
|
55538728 | over 7 years ago | node 5346112258:
|
55538728 | over 7 years ago | for node 5346112257:
|
55538728 | over 7 years ago | For node 5346112259:
|