OpenStreetMap
Hi all
I was wondering: what exactly is Map Quest Open? So far, I understand that it is the side of Map Quest for contributing to OSM, but is there anything fishy about it? Or is it genuinely an effort to make people contribute to OSM with a different flavour?
I tried using it, and I like the fact that there is more space for editing (I can’t figure out how to get rid of the left pannel on OSM’s website when using Potlatch???).
However, I noticed something funny: the building type “Family house” is not recognised when editing in QMO:
Does it mean that there are a few tags that QMO doesn’t recognise yet?
Which in-browser option would you recommend to use for editing OSM, and why?
Cheers and happy mapping!
讨论
Tom Chance 于 2013年03月11日 13:41 的评论
Hi chtfn,
I can see why you’re confused!
Both MapQuest Open’s editor and the editor on the OpenStreetMap homepage point at the same database, so if you use either one you are editing OpenStreetMap.
The slight differences you have noticed are because the software both use - called Potlatch 2 - allows for different set-ups, such as the tags that are recognised. MapQuest Open’s version of the software isn’t set-up to recognise houses, whereas the version on the OpenStreetMap homepage is. It looks like MapQuest also use an older version of Potlatch 2.
There are actually lots of different editors that you can experiment with. Here is a list:
osm.wiki/Editors
Which one is best? I’d recommend you just give them a go and see which you prefer. The most popular are the in-browser Potlatch 2 editor on the OpenStreetMap homepage, and a desktop editor called JOSM.
Vclaw 于 2013年03月11日 14:49 的评论
For using Potlatch 2 on openstreetmap.org, press M to hide the left panel.
Vanuan 于 2013年03月11日 21:23 的评论
Check out http://geowiki.com/iD/
Sanderd17 于 2013年03月11日 22:55 的评论
Nothing fishy about it. MapQuest has very bad data when it comes to other countries than the US. So they like to use OSM data for this.
In return, and for their own profit, they allow you to edit OSM data directly from the MapQuest site.
So it’s a genuine effort, but I don’t know if it’s technically best. Btw, Potlatch on OSM isn’t perfect either.
stragu 于 2013年03月12日 01:25 的评论
@Vclaw : Thanks for the tip, that changes everything! @Vanuan : That one looks very promising! However, it freezes very easily for me… Is it supposed to be made for mobile devices? @Sanderd17 : Great, thank you for your insight. I thought MapQuest was only using OSM data for their service - now I understand better!
I will be trying to get used to JOSM in the next few days, as this seems to be the best alternative when weighing all the pros and cons. One particular feature that I am looking forward to is photo mapping.
Cheers everyone!
DaCor 于 2013年03月13日 01:56 的评论
Hi chtfn, if you are going to use JOSM you should look at installin the building_tools plugin. It will make it a hundred times easier to add regular retangle/square buildings that look nice and tidy.
For oddly shaped buildings have a look at the extrude tool to modify a building you’ve drawn with building tools
Pop into the IRC chatroom for live help if you get stuck on anything
stragu 于 2013年03月13日 02:11 的评论
Hi DaCor
I will look into this plugin. I have been using the orthogonalizing tool yesterday - very useful to make buildings look neater.
Cheers!