Commentos de sus242424
Gruppo de modificationes | Quando | Commento |
---|---|---|
158200635 | 9 menses retro | office=surveyor would be correct attribute so please just type in "surveyor" in the big search field after adding the new point |
158200635 | 9 menses retro | It's just all Spam. We don't have an adress, the entry is without an attribute (at least you could use "company office" as attribute) and we have the false position. I had to delete most of the entries. Please stop it.
|
158227062 | 9 menses retro | Hello together. The name was added already 15 years ago. But I would delete it anyway, seems to be very unlikely that in Greece English way names are used. |
123409276 | 10 menses retro | Dear Andreas,
Thank you very much. Lieber Andreas,
Vielen Dank |
156578025 | 11 menses retro | Hello. If you like mapping buildings, I would like to recommend you to use the JOSM editor. You need to download it, but you are way faster with mapping. Especially with the "buildings" add-on osm.wiki/JOSM/Plugins/BuildingsTools. |
156583472 | 11 menses retro | Navođenje najveće brzine je u dvije tunelske cijevi različito, a biciklistima i dalje nije dopušteno voziti na autocestama. |
133724381 | 11 menses retro | Ovdje je isto. Također i "wayside_shrine". |
130490659 | 11 menses retro | Zdravo. Ovo je više "wayside_shrine" nego kapelica. "wayside_shrine" nije dostupno. Također, kapelica se ne zove "kapela" već vjerojatno ima neki drugi naziv. |
150295135 | 11 menses retro | Please no German names where German is not official language.
|
140137864 | 12 menses retro | Please no descriptive names and no German names where it is not the main language. |
140444826 | circa 1 anno retro | Hello Pauli, it doesn't make sense to change a track street into an unclassified street which follows a service street. so that higher street comes after the lower one. I've changed that back. |
154047731 | circa 1 anno retro | The Wiki is only about importing geodata anyway. The (systematic) transfer of data is of course not allowed. So the Wiki seems to be okay. However, in this particular case, where you're looking up specific common knowledge like in a dictionary, I don't think this wiki page is applicable (but I'm not a lawyer, so that's really just my humble opinion) ;-) |
154047731 | circa 1 anno retro | @mcliquid: I don't see any problem here. In my humble opinion you can't even argue with a database copyright, because place names, especially of these important cities, are common knowledge, it's not a collection of facts. So you can always make a mountain out of a molehill. ;-) |