Hello, welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thanks for your edits to the map. One bit of feedback, if you are going to merge (aka combine) two ways, you should make sure that the resulting tagging applies to the entirety of the new way. You merged the campground connector into the Arapaho Glacier Trail, but it is not part of that trail osm.org/way/228027744
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141219632

Hello, thanks for the edits. Based on the GNIS I just downloaded yesterday, the map boards at the trailheads, and the USGS topo maps, this is Red Deer Lake, not "Green Reservoir." It is likely that the GNIS node for Red Deer Lake had already been merged (so perhaps you didn't see it), the GNIS point for "Green Reservoir" is mislocated. I suspect "Green Lake Dam" is wrong as well.

As you probably know, in OSM we map "ground truth." If there is a trail on the ground, it can be mapped. If it is illegal to use the trail (and it is signed as such - it is generally not illegal to go off trail in the national forest), the access tags should be used to indicate this. Perhaps having these trails on the map will highlight the problem you are concerned about and result in some action being taken.

Trail numbers belong in the ref tag, not the name tag
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134781158

It is disappointing that tax payer dollars are being spent to vandalize an open source map, especially when the FS data is of such poor quality.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134354626

Whether or not these are "official" or not, the evidence on the ground clearly indicates that they are trails. In OSM we map ground truth, not what some government agency wishes were true.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thanks for the edits. One tip - please don't add fords where they don't exist. It is ok to leave a warning unaddressed if you don't have evidence as to the on-the-ground situation. This way another mapper that does have this information will see it and can make the correct change.

reverting an edit that added a fake beach - no evidence of sand or other loose surface here, and in fact there is quite a bit of vegetation.

osm.org/changeset/151206774

thanks for helping to clean up fake beaches!

reverting an edit that added a fake beach - there is vegetation here in all available imagery, and no indication of sand or other loose surface.

osm.org/changeset/151206685

reverting fake beach

osm.org/changeset/151188210

reverting fake edit - not a beach

osm.org/changeset/151149958

reverting fake edit - not a beach

osm.org/changeset/151149900

reverting fake edit - not parks

osm.org/changeset/151149788

reverting fake edit - not a park

osm.org/changeset/151149586

reverting fake edit - not a park

osm.org/changeset/151149535

reverting an edit that added a beach that doesn't exist

osm.org/changeset/151110287

reverting an edit that added a beach that doesn't exist

osm.org/changeset/151110176

Hello, welcome to OpenStreetMap. Thanks for your edits. This is not a natural=beach feature in OSM. Generally beaches have to be next to water and have a surface that is loose, such as sand, pebbles or shells. Not every bit of bare ground is a beach.

osm.org/changeset/151109022

Please don't make "test edits" to OpenStreetMap. Please only map things that are real.