Hi,
Thanks for looking into my edits. I have not added service=driveway, as the segment connects more than a single entity. I have made the changes as per your suggestion in the changeset (106825728).
Regards,
tmmanish

Hi,
Thank you for the input. I have added the service as per the OSM resources and cross checking the same with the roads in the vicinity. It is good to see the community providing their inputs, I have now changed the tag to parking aisle as per your suggestion. Please find the changeset(106825486) with modifications. Always happy to learn from the community.
Regards,
tmmanish

Hi,
Thanks for the input. I have added access as private based on presence of gate. Based on your local knowledge we reverted private access in this changeset. Happy to learn from you.

Thanks for checking into our edits. I will take this as a learning from the community and make sure to implement in my future edits. Happy to be a part of #hotosm-project-8863 #OSMKenya #lastmile

Hi,
Thanks for looking into my edit. We gave this access= private, since the road is leading to the Preschool from the available resources. Please let me know in case of any modifications.
Always happy to learn from the community.

Thanks,
tmmanish

Hi Andy,

Thanks for looking into my edit.The ford tag already exists for which i have added the access tag of MV=yes for the track road. Reverted the edits as per the community request. Didn't edit the ford part has there are no proper evidence. Please let me know if any further changes are to be made.Always happy to learn from community.

Regards,
tmmanish

Hey Neil,

Thank you for looking into my edit. I have understood the problem associated with the parallax in Maxar imagery. The team has been appropriately informed about the risk you have pointed out and have been advised to use the offset imagery tool in OSM to avoid making this mistake. I have taken a note of the same and would not repeat this mistake in future. Let me know in case you have any further concerns. I am always happy to learn from the community. Apologies for a delayed response.

Regards,
tmmanish

Hi,

Thank you for looking into my edit. This was an honest mistake and I will not repeat it in future. I understand the consequences and would be more careful going forward. Let me know in case you have any more suggestions!

Regards,
tmmanish

Hey Neil,

Thank you for looking into my edit. I have understood the problem associated with the parallax in Maxar imagery. The team has been appropriately informed about the risk you have pointed out and have been advised to use the offset imagery tool in OSM to avoid making this mistake. I have taken a note of the same and would not repeat this mistake in future. Let me know in case you have any further concerns. I am always happy to learn from the community.

Regards
tmmanish

Hi Nakaner-repair,

Thanks for your comments. From Satellite imagery we identified it to be a missing road so added the service road over here. However, from the community's local knowledge, I have understood that it is a mining area. Thanks for reverting the edit. Happy to learn from the local community.

Best Regards,
tmmanish

Hi Andy,

Reverting the "motor_vehicle=yes” attribute and deleted service road as per the request. Thanks for pointing out the error.

Changeset: osm.org/changeset/71941330

Regards,
tmmanish

Hi Andy,

Thanks for the response. This edit was made 20 days back when the update was not given to us on not adding motor_vehicle tag. Also the team is working on reverting back all the data which we added previously. Hoping to complete it by end of next week.. In this particular case, yes our delivery agent had travelled through this road which was validated with the 2016 satellite imagery and added this road. Do you know since when the building is closed? If you believe this is a wrong edit I can revert my changes based on your local knowledge.

Regards,
tmmanish

Hi ,

Thank you for providing feedback on the edit. The edit on "motor_vehicle=yes" attribute was made as vehicles were visible near the houses in the satellite imagery. Thanks for changing it back. Going forward We will add these tags only if there is a definite proof.

Please let us know if there is any other suggestion.

Regards,
tmmanish.

Hi ,

Thank you for providing feedback on the edit. The edit on "motor_vehicle=yes" attribute was made as vehicles were visible near the houses in the satellite imagery. Thanks for changing it back. Going forward We will add these tags only if there is a definite proof.

Please let us know if there is any other suggestion.

Regards,
tmmanish.

Hi Andy,

Thanks for looking into the edit. The access tags were added based on the possibility of our delivery partners to travel through this road. But as you suggested, reverting back my changes on access tags and leaving the newly added roads as it is. Do let me know if those roads are supposed to be reverted as well.
Changeset #71815118

Regards,
tmmanish