Thanks - it got missed when the Forth Road Bridge re-opened in January 2016. Good catch; now fixed.

Millions of flies eat shit, but pure numbers don't make a good argument: I'll not be changing my diet...

No, these are the names of the operators of those shops. If they are mis-tagged elsewhere, that doesn't mean they should be in Elgin, too.

Done.

Actually, both the relations you've edited here have lost their outer ways - please fix them.

I surveyed Craibstone to Charleston and Stonehaven last weekend, so expect an update with lanes, limits and lighting in the next day or two (plus refined positioning in parts).

I would guess so, but my survey was a few hours before it actually opened, so I haven't actually driven it yet.

Good catch - thanks for spotting that!

This link *is* open northbound (and the bridge is not yet open to traffic). I surveyed on Sunday and have now fixed this.

This link is definitely open - re-surveyed 2014-10-14

I take it you've actually surveyed these? The overbridge still looked closed when I passed at around 21:30. Also, when updating, please remove any obsolete proposed:* or construction:* that are no longer relevant, and update the speed limits. Thanks.

Thanks. I do keep my photo notes - just needed to find the right ones!

It didn't appear to be a public road, and I don't remember seeing vehicular access from B9124. Perhaps the access is from A9 Falkirk Road via the other "path"? It's certainly possible that I made a mistake, because this was a drive-by survey.

Thanks for that - I've merged those two, and a couple more duplicate bridges that I found. Do comment again if you find any more (or fix them yourself if it's obvious - there's a relation that might be useful: osm.org/relation/7455658).

This fixes duplication introduced in osm.org/changeset/51014313 and osm.org/changeset/49758202

Okay, I've unified them: osm.org/changeset/62465706

Okay, I've unified these: osm.org/changeset/62465706

There are two aqueducts: one opened in 1859 and the other in 1901. That extra one (without a start_date) looks like an imposter.

Well, if that's what's going to happen, it needs the tag wiki for 'ref' and any replacement tag to explicitly say when to use the standard tagging and when to use the new tagging - preferably with plenty of time to update editors, renderers and any scripts that group results by road, before such changes take place, surely?

Thanks - now joining the list to find out what's going on and how it can be fixed.