In addition, it appears your are deleting parking routes (lines), and replacing them with polygons, often without the tags that were associated with the routes, most importantly, name. Can you source the reason for deleting the routes, which per osm.wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking, prevents this statement from being true: "Routers generally are unable to route within an area without explicit roads and paths". Please justify your deletions.

It appears you are adding many parking areas where in fact they may not be parking areas. Are the parking areas you're adding marked/designated as parking, or simply areas where others in the past have parked a vehicle, destroying vegetation and causing resource damage? Do you have a secondary data source that can be used to verify the validity of these parking areas? osm.wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking defines "authorised users". Are all of the parking areas you're adding authorized parking areas?

So no ground truth? Did you hear back from the NPS about the validity of these features? Did they confirm they exist, are navigable, and "useful for users"?

Just because several people "went" somewhere on Strava, does not make it a trail; What you are seeing in the USGS Lidar is old RR beds from when the park is logged. They are not walkable trails; What specific satellite imagery (Date, platform)? I'll check it out. As for legal reasons for trail closures and illegal trail management, I refer you to the NPS for any comment on that. Do you have any on the ground confirmation of these trails? Does the landowner confirm they exist?

You are continually re-adding trails that either don't exist, have been closed for a legal reason, or have no ground verification. If you have further issues with legitimate edits, please bring them to the data working group via dispute resolution or attend https://osmus.civicrm.org/civicrm/event/info?reset=1&id=41&noFullMsg=true. Are you able to provide another source of information/data that confirm the existence of these trails? NPS data source?

You are continually re-adding trails that either don't exists, have been closed for a legal reason, or have no ground verification. If you have further issues with legitimate edits, please bring them to the data working group via dispute resolution or attend https://osmus.civicrm.org/civicrm/event/info?reset=1&id=41&noFullMsg=true. Are you able to provide another source of information/data that confirm the existence of these trails? NPS data source?

trails that are closed due to restriction, do not exist, etc. Just because someone saw a 100 year old tree skid on lidar or saw it on a strava heat map does not make it a trail.

Yes.

If it was deleted, it was an error

Yes, in fact, this is based on "proper sources", which include field survey with survey-grade GPS. " those trails appears clearly" are in fact old logging skids from the early 1900's which are resolving as ground disturbances due to the incredibly high posting density of the lidar data. Ground disturbances do not meet the definition of osm.wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath. If you have any ground truth data that can substantiate your remotely sensed data source, such as photographs, GPS, etc.