OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
81562052 over 5 years ago

Hi, the video you have used for this section is rather old. For example the line still has semaphore signalling. At least on conditional speed limit sign, just south of Wem station, is not shown on this video.

The continuation of the video you were using south of Shrewsbury is much more recent.

Cheers Phil

81474908 over 5 years ago

Hi, this is an interesting source.

I am concerned that wondering if you have recieved permission to use this video?

Cheers Phil

81413889 over 5 years ago

Hi
You seem to have added oneway=yes to ways already tagged as junction=roundabout. I am wondering what fixes you believe are necessary?
The wiki states "oneway=yes is implied and redundant. Though it is not wrong to add it explicitly, it is not needed".

Cheers Phil

81414842 over 5 years ago

Hi
I am a bit confused by this edit. It is normal for roundabouts to be split as part of route relations yet in this edit you have joined the roundabout back into a single way which is no longer correct.
Just wondering what you thought was wrong and needed fixing?

Cheers Phil

81310623 over 5 years ago

Please disregard the above comment, I was looking at a draf policy and made quick assumptions about the URLs.

I was wrong, sorry.

Cheers Phil

81310623 over 5 years ago

Hi
The URL you have previously added seems to contain a lot of random junk, I assume that this is some sort of marketing/tracking activity. If so that is not acceptable use of OSM. For this hotel you only need https://www.hilton.com/en/hotels/bhxsadi-doubletree-stratford-upon-avon/

Also is this account, from the first edit, being used by a single individual. Shared accounts are also not acceptable and all edits in OSM should be attributable to an individual.

Cheers Phil

81387220 over 5 years ago

Sorry, I misread the location on mapillary.

It appears that the vehicle crossing from Highcroft Drive has also gone and has been replaced by a foot/cycle crossing.

https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/6T7MbkdVlJj21ksONK4oiQ

Sorry about that, do you want me to fix this one?

Cheers Phil

81387220 over 5 years ago

Hi, thank you for your edit however please remember that OSM is not simply a map for drivers.
In deleting this link you have also lost routing for pedestrians and cyclists. Mapillary shows, as would be expected when a road route is cut, a cycleway crossing. Please add this and take care not to break routing in future.

Cheers Phil

81271034 over 5 years ago

I will fix that later.

I am sure you have mapped this from your own

knowledge, but please do bear copyright issues in mind in future.

In osm mapper knowledge is the gold standard, there is no need to provide justification for that.

Cheers Phil

81271034 over 5 years ago

Thank you for the reply.

Is there really a building within a building, or is the outer the garden? In which case it should be landuse=residential.

Cheers Phil

81271034 over 5 years ago

Sorry
Foot=yes/bicycle=yes/horse=yes/motor_vehicle=private.

81271034 over 5 years ago

Hi, welcome to Please do not either refer to, or look at planning applications when mapping. We do not have permission to use them and the maps are based on OS, which are copyright.
The access road was correctly mapped as a track, it is unsurfaced. In the UK an unclassified road will be surfaced, plus this is legally a bridleway therefor motor vehicle access is only for access to properties and should be tagged as private.
Cheers Phil

81237434 over 5 years ago

Should the landuse have changed here, also the road does not connect.

Cheers Phil

80853767 over 5 years ago

Bore da, this is a rather unlikely setting for a neolithic stone circle, maybe tag it as an artwork rather than historic?

Diolch Phil

81239314 over 5 years ago

Hi, thank you for the addition, however I am wondering why have you added the Wash Stones as residential road?

Cheers Phil

81166574 over 5 years ago

Why have you added motor_vehicle=no to a footpath, the highway classification indicates it is not for motor vehicles.

Cheers Phil

81111712 over 5 years ago

Hi, in OSM the name tag should only be used for actual names. It should not be used to make a description render on the map.

Cheers Phil

80954335 over 5 years ago

Hi Tom
You seem to have accidently included residental area osm.org/way/301340583 in the cycleway 56 relation.

Cheers Phil

80903630 over 5 years ago

Hi, welcome to OSM.

Most of your edits seem to involve copying information from websites. Do you have specific permission to copy from these sites.

The geographical spread of your edits suggest you are not using local knowledge and the address for this one suggests you have placed it in the wrong place.

Please could you confirm your sources and permissions obtained.

Cheers Phil

80752692 over 5 years ago

Hi, how you doing? Are you back in Shrewsbury?

Just wondering why you have removed foot=designated? In GB we use designated on rights of way to indicate that it is a legal right, and not merely allowed.

Cheers Phil