A campsite with no drinking water?

Cheers Phil

Hello Vladislav
Phil from the Data Working Group here.

I am a bit concerned by this edit and have some questions.
What is there in the names that in any way could be described as profanities?
What guided you to this changeset, was it some sort of report or do you have a query which targets certain words?

As a bare minimum Evan deserved at least the courtesy of a changeset comment explaining what you think is wrong before a revert.

Is Seafood Shack really operated by Age Concern?
I suspect you didn't check all the tags.
Cheers Phil

Hello Jshaughn
Phil from the Data Working Group here.

Openstreetmap is a map of the world and should reflect reality. Changing this for your own ends is considered vandalism

I have reverted your edits and added a private tag, this will prevent this driveway being used as a shortcut whilst allowing deliveries to be made to you and your neighbours..

Reverted by DWG

Reverted by DWG

Hi
Foot=permissive is very unlikey for these urban paths, they should be foot=yes.

There is no need for motor vehicle or horse tags on a footway.

Cheers Phil

Hello Alwyn from Wem, where the sweet peas grow.

My main comment is that you have spelt the name of my hometown wrong, it is Wem, not Wen. That is in the changeset comments and the from and to tags.

When you are passing through PM me and maybe join me for a beer.

Cheers Phil

Hello Shan
Phil from the Data Working Group here.

Please can you explain these edits and your workflow?

What does source=deduce mean?

Cheers Phil

Hi Dan
OSM derives the relationship from level 10 being inside a level 6 or 8 inside a level 4 up to being inside a level 2 UK.
Cheers Phil

Hi Dan
I was atlking about your additions to the higher admin boundaries.

Reverting does just create a new version. We (the data working group) can redact but we only do that for thing that need tags be not seen.

The review requested is a bit misleading, it merely sets a flag that someone may spot but setting it no way guarantees anything will happen.

Cheers Phil

Boundary lines are imported from official data and are correct.
If they do not match features on the ground it suggests that they were traced without properly aligning imagery.
Cheers |Phil

Hi Phil from the Data Working Group here.
Please don't do this, the only logical conclusion is that the UK relation version number goes up exponentially.
I have removed this and amp planning to remove the others you have added.

Sorry about that, I should have gone back further.
Although the main issue was the lift gates.

Same dodgy mapping as at Stone

Due to your dodgy mapping OSMand was trying to sen me on a long diversion as you have rendered Aston by Stone Crossing un-routable by your addition of lift gates (tagging for the renderer?).
Please don't do that, level crossing barriers are mapped as and attribute to the level crossing. Please see osm.wiki/Tag:railway=level%20crossing?uselang=en
Also the crossing tag you have added is for pedestrians to cross the road, not a railway crossing. This is a mistake I would expect from a beginner.
Cheers Phil

Hello
Describing a garage forecourt as a pedestrian highway is a little odd is it not?
There was nothing wron with the existing highway=service area=yes.
Cheers Phi

This is a PROW crossing, not a road.
I have restored it to the map.

There are no curent path orders for Whitchurch Rural.
This edit has removed a valid Restricted Byway. I am reverting these edits.
The crossing is clearly not intended for vehicles so will update from track to bridleway.

Still no response so reverted.
The level 6 authorities had been restored earlier.