OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
135329960 over 2 years ago

Hi
What sources did you use for this edit?

It appears to be a purely armchair edit and has undone edits made by the National Trust using on the ground knowledge.

Whilst it may not have been perfect, it is clearly a work in progress done with on the ground knowledge.

A comment on the changeset would have been preferable.

You should not assume the definitive map is accurate, in OSM we map the 'walked line'.

Not sure what you mean by "If not ground truth but only legal, it should be removed or tagged different" but how do you know they there is no ground truth. It is rare for rights of way over farmland to be visible on imagery, ground truth are the gates/stiles and waymarks which need to be surveyed.

Cheers Phil

135080136 over 2 years ago

This edit is also incorrect. These are mini-roundabouts which have been correctly mapped for 14 years.
I have reverted this change.

135079920 over 2 years ago

This edit is incorrect, these are not roundabouts and have been correctly mapped as mini-roundabouts for the past 13 years.

1681536 over 2 years ago

It should be tagged as 14" as per OSM wiki for imperial measurements.

Cheers Phil

134586779 over 2 years ago

I am not sure I would have put this back.

The pub was looking very derelict in February, so don't expect it to exist much longer.

Cheers Phil

134587414 over 2 years ago

Hi
This edit was a little wrong.

Maxheight should be on the way to which it applies so that routers see it, it shouldn't be on the way that crosses the bridge.

An imperial limit in this case should be 15'0", not 15 ft.

I have fixed this, so thank you for reminding me.

Cheers Phil

132587863 over 2 years ago

Can you explain how a member of the Peak and Northern Footpath Society is in any way a conflict?

132585296 over 2 years ago

Hi, this edit looks very wrong. Why did you decide all vehicles over 7.5t are subject to the restriction rather than just goods vehicles over 7.5t.
Did you visit the site?

133717538 over 2 years ago

Hi, how exactly did you decide removing the casino tag was correct? Maybe you should have removed the restaurant tag. Or maybe they are both correct?

Cheers Phil

133693513 over 2 years ago

Hi, this edit has gone a bit wrong.

Why have you deleted the drive-through?

Cheers Phil

133584727 over 2 years ago

The wiki provides a reasonable description of a rest area, however extending that to a layby is going a bit far.

In a layby you are unlikely to get toilets or picnic tables, although you may get a bin if you are lucky

For some reason the UK never did proper rest areas, as you find in France, where an area similar to that of a service area is provided with just parking, picnic tables and toilets.
These are away from traffic where you can sit and enjoy lunch. My girlfriend and I choose these when traveling in France and take a picnic with us.
osm.org/#map=17/46.15857/1.37807

https://mapillary.com/map/im/312447120374092

Mapping laybys, such as this as rest areas is very misleading. If mapping them as areas they should be tagged as amenity=parking.

Cheers Phil

133584727 over 2 years ago

Hi, a layby hardly fits the wiki description of a rest areas. Rest areas, as found in France which this tag is intended to represent do not really exist in the UK.
Would you really stop here, expect to sit at a table and enjoy lunch while the kids run around?

Please revert, this and other similar edits that break the quality of OSM data.

Cheers Phil

133017483 over 2 years ago

Whilst this is not the correct way to map rights of way in a OSM, we should map what is on the ground (best from a survey) which often differs from the definitive map.
Rights of way do legally end when a path enters highway land, it is not poor mapping by the local authority, the definitive map has different requirements to OSM, it is a legal document and reflects that legal status.

130217968 over 2 years ago

It was odd name:en tags on things native speakers don't translate I was looking for :)

130217968 over 2 years ago

It was an error in the name suggestion index. An only Algeria update had gone in as except Algeria.It should now have been fixed.
I afterwards realise you were not the only mapper to add these tags.

130217968 over 2 years ago

Aussi osm.org/node/9664432823

130217968 over 2 years ago

osm.org/node/6609364648 s'est un peu mal passé. La brand devrait sûrement être en Français?

osm.org/node/6609364648 has gone a little wrong. Surely the brand should be in French?

120209907 over 2 years ago

Hi Milan
I originally spotted the odd looking Welsh name whilst route planning with OSMand set to Welsh.

The Welsh name is also a description rather than the name. You seem to have simply copied the titles from Wikipedia for Welsh and other languages. In Wikipedia the title obviously needs something to differentiate the station page from the street page. That is not necessary in OSM.
Cheers Phil

131503279 over 2 years ago

Please split your edits into sensible areas, at a maximum a country at a time.

124816262 over 2 years ago

@rskedgell
I never got a response