Hi
Legal prohibitions of foot/horse/bikes are very rare in the UK.

I cannot recall any such restriction on this part of the A5 and cannot see the necessary signs of mapillary imagery.

You say Self Observered, what precisely did you observe to make this judgement?

Cheers Phil

Is there a ramp or is this only for the super fit?

Also please make your changeset comments meaningful so as to describe to other mappers what and why you are changing things.

Cheers Phil

I have completely reverted these changes in osm.org/changeset/148348284

iD is not a suitable tool for reverting this number of changes. I did say we can revert these as we have experience with more powerful tools.

Please do try reverting them with iD, I am in the process of doing a revert and am working through the conflicts caused by later edits, I am trying to avoid loosing later changes.

Cheers Phil

We can revert the changes.

It is obviously possible to do your own survey of such things or add them from your own local knowledge.

Cheers Phil

Fair use of facts is an American concept. OSM is a UK organisation and in the UK we have a laws on database rights. Taking information on the scale you have from a database on this scale is not fair use. CAMRA have spent time and effort collecting these facts and under UK law this effort is protected.

Found it https://www.trapezegroup.com/

@TJ@Trapeze
You should not change OSM tagging to suit your software as that is likely to break other peoples applications.

If your software cannot use a service road then it suggests that your software is broken and needs to be fixed.

"to support upstream system" suggests this is some sort of organised edit. You may need to comply withhttps://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

What upstream system are you refering ?to?

That would also say to me that we cannot use whatpub and I believe this, very long, list of edits require reverting/redacting.

Ok, thank you.

Phil

Hi
Access=no is still present after your edit.

Cheers Phil

Intrigued what was weird about the tagging?

Hi
osm.org/way/1208820049 seems a bit odd for a bridleway. Bicycle should be yes and horse designated although the difference between yes and designated in unimportant. It shouldn't be destination.

Both OSM objects valid, one is an administrative county which provides the usual council services.
The ceremonial county still covers other things. Each should have its own wikidata and Wikipedia items, as do others in the UK.

Bore da
The name:cy tag you have added is in English, not Ysgol something?

Diolch Phil

Why have you deleted these ways which are clearly visible on aerial imagery?

Cheers Phil

Thank you

Why unclassified, these are private and very restricted? Service is perfect, its not as through you can drive around the Roundabout and come back out.

What is the source of this edit?

There is no evidence of this being oneway on https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=51.300557%7E0.931243&lvl=18.6&pi=-14.8&style=x&dir=19.9

Cheers Phil

As a local mapper I am intrigued by what sources you were using to determine that this canal is open?