Hi, I think this edit has gone very wrong. Please can you explain why you have changed a residential area to an administrative boundary?
Cheers Phil

Seems to have been reverted by originator without comment or explaination

Hi, what is the source of this import?

Cheers Phil

Hi, welcome to OSM. Thank you for your contribution but you have made a very common newbie mistake. The name tag is for actual names, not to add a description, This object is already tagged as barrier=turnstile and that is all it needs.
Cheers Phil

Also if there is nothing on the ground, what source have you used?

Hi, if this is neither under construction or funded then it is extremly misleading to tag is as construction. It should be removed until work actually starts, as it may never happen and this is unlikely to be the exact path.

Cheers Phil

No, but I can see it exists and it appears on OS maps and it was mapped by a local mapper so I see no reason to remove their work.

It is a driveway, it has been tagged as highway=service which implies it is not a public highway. I will tag it more implicitly as as service=driveway, access=private.

Then the correct way is to tag it as access=private, not pretend that it doesn't exist.

Hi, welcome to OSM.
I am a little confused as to why you have deleted this service road, it appears on OS Opendata and is the only way to navigate to Cwmffrwd for delivery drivers so appears to be important information.
Cheers Phil

Please answer the question here, changeset discussion should be open and visible to all.
It is not acceptable to ask mappers to send changeset discussions to a non-osm email address.

Cheers Phil

In this case I would assume access=private

Thank you for your reply, however this needs access tags.

Hi, should these be tagged as parking_aisles and they should also have some sort of access tags?
Cheers Phil

Are you sure this isn't a track?

Cheers Phil

Hi, you seem to have added a network of roads here to which you have not added any access tags. There really should be some, clearly there are Health and Safety issues with routing through farmyards.
I assume you have inside knowledge of where deliveries are to be made, so you will be able to sensibly apply restrictions.
Cheers Phil

Please answer the question here, changeset discussion should be open and visible to all.
It is not acceptable to ask mappers to send changeset discussions to a non-osm email address.

Cheers Phil

Thank you freebeer.

Reverted to commonly used name

Hi, thank you for this addition however please be careful and considerate of existing objects. In this case there is an existing track which you have crossed without connecting or tidying.
Cheers Phil

Hi, tertiary seems a bit of a high classification considering that it is linking to an unclassified. I would suggest this should also be unclassified.
Cheers Phil