Hi, it is an easy mistake to make. But information found on websites is copyright and we must not copy such information.

You may find this page helpful osm.wiki/Beginners_Guide_1.1

Cheers Phil

Hi, what is the source of this edit. Have you visited these places to confirm that these shops have in facet changed and that they are still open.
You edits do seem to cover a very large area, you may need to read osm.wiki/Automated_edits and discuss these edits with the UK community. See https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Cheers Phil

Hi, welcome to OSM. Did you obtain explicit permission to copy the opening hours from the website?

Hi, this is an odd name. Is this really the address?
Cheers Phil

I have removed this duplication and added the website to the original object.
Cheers Phil

Hi, welcome to OSM. When adding things to OSM please check that what you are not duplicating existing features. The Kendal Caravan club site already exists, I am removing this duplication.
Cheers Phil

Hi, welcome to OSM. Thank you for your edit, however one small thing. Where paths join you should just connect them with a node, it should not be tagged as a railway crossing.
Cheers Phil

There is really a monument here, have you any details?

Hi, has this construction been finished yet?
It was added 8 years ago and still nothing on any imagery which seems a little odd.
Cheers Phil

Hi, is osm.org/way/36995595/history really closed?
Cheers Phil

Hi Mike
Once construction begins you can begin adding the line in from your own estimations. Once it is complete and you can walk it you can use the gps trace to improve the alignment.
We certainly must not use planning applications as a source, the maps will be based on OS maps and we must not copy from those.

I did have a look at this area last week, sad considering how I remember it. Used to cycle here during school holidays, the old Lubbesthorpe Bridle Road was something special.

Sadly the 14 speed bumps are all too real.
Cheers Phil

The wiki osm.wiki/Tag:highway%3Dproposed does say that proposed features should only be added in exceptional circumstances after discussion with the community. In the case of new urban sprawl that is unlikely to be the case

Hi Mike
Please do not abuse the name tag, that is for actual name. It is not a place to dump miscellaneous information.
The correct way to tag a proposed feature is to use highway=proposed. Although the consensus is that until there is something verifiable on the ground and we can add it as construction then it should not be mapped. For example what was the source of this route, is is compatable with OSM licensing?
My suggestion would be to remove it until there is something real to map, until then it is just fantasy.
Cheers Phil

Reverted

Reverted

Reverted, the park was drawn correctly. It does not extend to the centre of the road

Reverted

Duplication reverted

Reverted

Vandalism reverted