Hi, this edit has gone a little wrong.
The extent of the public highway was already correctly mapped.
This area was mapped by a survey, however Bing imagery clearly shows the kerb demarking the public highway/highway=residential.
Beyond that is a private shared driveway which should be tagged as highway=service/service=driveway.
Cheers Phil

Hi, Music Bros is already mapped and correctly tagged in the correct location.
Please do not add duplicates.
Cheers Phil

Hi, this is not a residential road. That is clear from imagery and it would be a bit odd to find a gate on a publicly accessible road.
This is a private driveway.
Cheers Phil

You have mapped parks in areas that clearly private gardens. These are not parks and should be mapped as residential areas.

Hi, in OSM we map what exists on the ground.
This area is not a park so I am reverting these edits.

Telford Town Park is already mapped, this is a duplication

Reverted

This is a residential area, not a park

These paths are simply doodles and do not exist on the ground. I am reverting this changeset,

Hi, in OSM we map what is on the ground.
This is clearly a Caravan Site, it is not a park.
I am reverting this edit.

Thank you for you edit, however please try to tag thing correctly and position them in the correct place. This is not a department store.
I have corrected the position and type.
Cheers Phil

Access tags are about legal access rather than ownership. This is for all practical purposes a public highway, with a toll.
What are you trying to achieve with this change?
Cheers Phil

Thank you for this addition, it is clearly a new residential area.
However when mapping please consider the existing mapping, in this case landuse, and adjust the residential area to incorporate this new development.
Cheers Phil

Hi, this should be tagged access=private. There are signs saying "Residents Only".

Cheers Phil

Also imagery suggests that there is not a ford here and the stream can be seen entering a culvert to the south.
Often when mapping in rural areas lwaterways need to be improved, OS Opendata Streetview is a good source for this.
Cheers Phil

Hi, this edit has gone a little wrong.
Imagery suggests that there is only a single way here which had originally been mapped as a footpath. Rather than create a duplication, this should have been merged and corrected.
This a legally a public footpath, a right of way on foot only, so the access tagging can very easilybe deduced.
foot=designated
bicycle=private
horse=private
motor_vehicle=private

Hope this helps, Phil

Hi, this edit has gone very wrong.
You have created a routeable link through what is very clearly a private roads.
The bit through farm buildings should give a hint of this.
This and osm.org/way/698314468 should be tagged as access=private. Remember the act of ordering something for delivery is an invitation to access private roads.
From my memory this is simply signed off the A53 with the name of a farm.
Cheers Phil

Hi, when using QA tools you should not take them too literally. Foot=designated is used by UK mappers on PROWs to indicate that foot is not only allowed, but is a legal right.
I consider that removing such tags is a loss of important information.
Please restore these tags as they are an important part of mapping in the UK.
Cheers Phil

Hi, this edit has gone a little wrong. This is a shared driveway and should be mapped as highway=service, service=driveway, access=private.
When adding highway=residential please remember that it is highly unlikely that the mapper will have missed a road but they are unlikely to map private driveways.
Cheers Phil

Also why have you changed osm.org/way/350314926/history to a tunnel ?