Again why, what are you correcting? There is not a single building covering the entire retail park.

Cheers Phil

Hi, what are you correcting here? You seem to have deleted the retail area, which doesn't look wrong to me.

Cheers Phil

HI, these edits have gone kind of pear shape.
You have removed the building tags from the buildings and have then added a large building which covers the entire retail park, including the car park. Please can you explain what you were trying to fix as your changeset comment does not explain it too well.

Cheers Phil

Hi, this change is little confusing.

You have added a name:en to the cafe, whilst leaving the name in place. If the name has changed, then you should change the name tag. I Assume the name should be Blasau Delicatessen and is no longer Royal House. Also based on the name is it still a cafe?
In Wales I would only expect to see name:en alongside name:cy.
Also wondering why your locale is set to en-AU?

Cheers Phil

Hi, welcome to OSM.
What is the source of this height? I do not remember it being 78m tall :)

More seriously I suspect you meant 78 feet, that should be entered as 78', although it is preferred for buildings that the value is converted to metres.

Cheers Phil

Hi Srinatpa
What was wrong with the original mapping of the bollard?

A bollard blocks routing of motor_vehicles with all routers I know of, and if that is not occuring with the router your drivers are using then it suiggests that the router is broken and should be fixed.

What router are your drivers using?

If the bollard needed access tags to clarify then they should have been added to the bollard, for example the bollard may be removable to allow emergency access. But typically motor_vehicle=no, foot=yes, bicycle=yes, horse=yes.

This area has been on the to-survey list for a couple of months, an unpaved residential road is a bit odd, especially the way other roads are arranged around it,

For flooding, rain and lockdown reasons the survey has yet to happen.

If you want to see PROW refs you need a more specialist render of the OSM database. For example http://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#zoom=18&lat=52.866147&lon=-2.727271

HTH Phil

Hi Will, I have no idea what a TIPLOC is and wouldn't recognise one if I saw one.

What I am concerned about is the addition of unverifiable objects into OSM based on guesswork.

A simple search would have told you that Mantle Lane is elsewhere. However what timetable are you using? This is a goods line and there has been no regular goods services beyond Bardon Hill since the closure of the pits.

Cheers Phil

Hi, this edit has gone rather wrong.

There has been a bollard mapped here for several years, and this alone should prevent the passage of motor_vehicles. I have tested this with OSRM, Graphhopper and OSMand so I am concerned that you felt this edit necessary.

What router are your drivers using? If it was routing this way suggests that the problem is with the router and you should be raising a bug with the developers, not changing valid OSM data.

The other issue I have with this and other similar Amazon edits is your choice of footway. These features are to prevent Rat Running by motor vehicles, not to prevent cycling, so in these cases a cycleway would be far more appropriate. Please review the other cases where these changes have been made.

Cheers Phil

Hi, this is rather a long way from Mantle Lane, why have you put it here?

Cheers Phil

Hi, I am rather surprised to find this service road here, osm.org/way/733631503

This area is now a quarry, so I would be rather surprised if your drivers have provided GPS traces. The imagery you used is not the latest and when editing surely the landuse=quarry on the surrounding area should have been a big big clue.

Cheers Phil

Hi
These edits look rather odd to me, please could you explain what sources you are using?

These edits do seem to be a long way from your other edits.

Cheers Phil

Hi, welcome to OSM.
Please keep you changesets to sensible areas, adding buildings on two different continents should have been split into at least two changesets as it creates a large bounding boxes that other mappers see in their area.

Please also use meaningful changeset comments which actually describe what you are doing. Meaningless hashtags alone are gobbledygook and tell the OSM community nothing.

Cheers Phil

Ok, so lets assume the English Imperialistic name is ok as.the name tag,

OSM is still a geographical database which users render in many different ways. Some render the map in Welsh, this includes places in England or other countries. That uses name:cy, and in this case I have put it back to Abertyfi.

Why have you deleted the Welsh name from Abertyfi?
It is verifiable on local signage.

Reino
What you are describing is (mis)tagging for the renderer, which is an absolute no no in OSM. Please stop doing this.
osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

OSM is primarily a geographical database and your explaination is at best only true of the default renderer.

Mapping features such as this is best done by a survey, they are often indistinct and are certainly not something that can be armchaired from aerial imagery.

Also why do you assume what is inside the stone circle is different to that surounding it?

Cheers Phil

What sources have you used here, what evidence is there that there is an embankment here. It would be a very unusual thing to find around a stone circle afterall.

Cheers Phil

Hi, why have you added an embankment here?

Have you been here and observed this embankment as there are no embankments shown on the photo on wikipedia?

Also it seems rather strange to add the place name in brackets, we can work that out from the location.

Also not from your edit but the name should be Meini Hirion or tall stones in English.

Hi Brian
Mapping farmland as large multipolygons makes future detail mapping of farmland, such as tagging as arable, pasture or meadow, or adding boundaries much harder for other mappers.

This subject was discussed on talk-gb last December and the consensus was that farmland is better mapped as individual fields. Several mappers having come to that conclusion independently.

The thread is at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2019-December/023889.html

Cheers Phil

For this line https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ttS7a20MR7E and its follow on, are much more recent.

Cheers Phil