Hi, welcome to OSM.

I think this edit has added incorrect information.
1. The shop hasn't been a One Stop for a lot of years, the Post Office is a node within the shop and doesn't have a name. It is perfectly fine for an object not to have a name despite what Streetcomplete thinks.

2. The allotments do not have a name, they are just referred to a The Allotments, but that is a description not a name.

3. The node you added Markfield Surgery to is a duplicate, the correct name is Markfield Medical Centre and that was already mapped. The duplicate is my fault, sorry.

Cheers Phil

Hi Mario
This edit is incorrect. The object here is the AONB, not The Forest of Bowland which this wikidata/wikipedia tags you added refer to.
As far as I am aware the AONB does not have a wikidata item but please do not add incorrect information just because it is a similar name.

This edit should be reverted.

Cheers Phil

They added bicycle=yes which will have improved routing, although it is tagging for the renderer.

Hi sdfzxdgxfhdr
This changeset did noy change the A629 to a trunk road, it has always been mapped that way and does appear to be correct. Green signs?

If your router cannot route along a trunk road then it is not configured correctly, use one that works such as graphhopper or cycle.travel.

Cheers Phil

Did you really use all of these imagery sources, it looks rather odd as Bing streetside is very urbancentric and certainly not available here.
Sources should only include what is actually used.

Cheers Phil

Did you really use all of these imagery sources, it looks rather odd as Bing streetside is very urbancentric and certainly not available here.
Sources should only include what is actually used.

Cheers Phil

Hi, in OSM names are for actual names and should not be for references.

In OSM these should be put into the prow_ref tag. You probably do not need to include PROW in this tag.

You should also add designation tags such as public_footpath/pubic_bridleway when mapping rights of way.

More specialist renders of OSM will display rights of way references.

See https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#zoom=17&lat=52.866733&lon=-2.72515

Cheers Phil

I have reverted this changeset as Mario did not respond

Bore da, Croeso y OSM.

The wikidata tag on this object was correct.

This is object is the admin boundary for the community, which had the correct tag.

This is not the city of St Davids which the wikidata you changed it to. That was already on the place node.

This changeset needs to be reverted.

Cheers Phil

If this path has a verifiable name (i.e. a sign) then the name should be on the way. You should not add a separate node and the description is not needed, we can see where it goes.
Cheers Phil

Please do not duplicate information, if the tags are on the building then you should not add a node. Also if a building has a housename then there is not need for a name tag containing the same information.

Cheers Phil

Just realised you did not add the opening hours.

Cheers Phil

Again please do not duplicate building and only use name tags for objects that have names, this is not called private dwelling.

Cheers Phil

I find it hard to believe the relatively new toilets have been replaced during lockdown. If they are connected to the building then you should correct that, not delete and redraw.
Please do not use name tags for objects that are descriptions, the name is not Public Toilets, the chances are there is no name however you have lost the important amenity tags which allows the object to be found.

Cheers Phil

Hi, welcome to OSM thank you for your edits however this edit has gone a little wrong.

You have moved Starbucks a long way from its actual location. Also Public holiday tagging of opening times does not really work in cases such as this, is it really open on Christmas Day?

Also Bear Steps Art Gallery was mapped as a node within the building, there is only one building so it is not good practice to create a duplicate building with duplicate tags.

Cheers Phil

There should be no problem tagging these as private. In ordering something for delivery you are giving permission for access.

Any router worth its salt will popup a dialog and ask, For example OSMand says "Your destination is located in an area with private access. Allow using private roads for this trip?"

Cheers Phil

I don't think osm.org/way/833630805 extends to the middle of the road.

Cheers Phil

Fixed in osm.org/changeset/89045457

Fixed in osm.org/changeset/89045457

Please see my comments made in osm.org/changeset/89031345

Cheers Phil