Hi, welcome to OSM.
Please can you explain why you have deleted a service road, that is clearly visible on satellite imagery?

Hi, welcome to OSM.
I think something has gone a bit wrong here, you seem to have added the apartment, but for some reason have removed the highway tag from Leicester Square.

BTW
You will not always find the tags you need as editor presets but you can type in your own.

Hi Paul
That looks better, you can add the following tags to complete the information if you wish
website=http://www.beddgelertbikes.co.uk
amenity=bicycle_rental

Cheers Phil

Hi, welcome to OSM.
Have you surveyed this location, is it a real bricks and mortar shop that is verifiable and I can visit?
The web site makes me suspicious that it is not a real shop (its hardly in a location to catch passing trade, but a marker for a web/phone business.
If verifiable, it is certainly not a bike shop, it should be tagged as amenity=bicycle_rental.
The web address should not be in the name tag, that really shouldn't appear on the map. The name is Beddgelert Bikes.
Cheers Phil

Please could you point me to where these routes are verifiable in the UK.

Hi, welcome to OSM.
Are you sure the speed limit is only 10mph?

Cheers Phil

E roads are not signposted in the UK, there is little point on a island where ferry/shuttle prices/schedules are far more important than E numbers.
We do not add int_ref to roads for this reason however the E13 is mapped as a relation making these additions unnecessary,
Cheers Phil

Please can you explain this, it looks like a doodle/vandalism to me.

S'il vous plaît pouvez -vous expliquer cela , il ressemble à un doodle / vandalisme pour moi.

Thanks/Merci

Hi, welcome to OSM.
Something seems to have gone wrong here, the building now seems to be a very strange shape, would you like help fixing it?

What is the source of the 20 mph speed limits you have added for Taunton Mews and Huntsworth Mews? They do not appear on mapillary so I am wondering if they are genuine?
Also Huntsworth Mews looks too narrow to have lane markings, the lanes=2 tag should only be used when the road is marked with lanes. These are obviously very unusual for residential streets.
Also please can you explain why you see the need to add pointless tags such as foot=yes bicycle=yes to residential roads?
All they do is make the important, not default tags harder to spot for othe mappers in the community.

Hi, welcome to OSM.
I assume the path still exists, so should really not be deleted as it is still useful for navigation.
In this case the foot=permissive tag should simply be removed. The access=private will do the rest.
Do you need any help restoring it?
Cheers Phil

Hi
I have spotted that you have made this edit in an area I am familiar with this and I am wondering what the source of this information was. You seem to have added lanes=2 to many roads and I wonder if you surveyed them? For example osm.org/way/38685754 doesn't have lanes for most of its length so this can be confusing to routers. Also you have added many pointless tags such as foot=yes, bicycle=yes, oneway=no. These are completely unnecessary on most roads and just add clutter to make it difficult for mappers to spot the important tags.
Please could you tell me your sources and why you believe these tags add anything?
Obviously in a city centre where most roads are oneway, then the odd one that isn't oneway=no is useful, however in the countryside this is not the case.
Thanks Phil

Hi, welcome to OSM.
Thank you for your addition, however the hotel is already mapped as a way, which is the preferred method of mapping large buildings.
I am going to revert this duplication

Hi, welcome to OSM. I see you have created a footpath, however it doesn't connect to anything. Would it be possible to continue it along its full route.
Give me a shout if you need any help.
Cheers Phil

Hi, welcome to OSM.
The Baozi Inn is already mapped, you have therefore created a duplicate and it is in the middle of Newport court.
I am reverting this.

I have reverted this, and your other changeset.
I did spot that prior to your original change, the towpath had been drawn under the bridge and you incorrectly moved it into the field.

Hi, this seems to have gone wrong again so ask please stop editing in the UK and leave notes that the local community can deal with the issues as they posses the local knowledge.
I am not sure why mapbox care about isolated bridges on the canal network, but they are not an error.
In this case you have now deleted an entire section of towpath (osm.org/way/327119715/history), that is not good as it forms a walking and cycling route.
Also please be careful with your changeset comments, this is not Texas

I have reverted this, please use bookmarks rather than add place to store personal information

Hi, welcome to osm. This looks a little weird, I am fairly sure the isn't a caravan site in the middle of Legolands car park.
Please can you confirm what you were trying to achieve ?