Please do not duplicate roads, the HOT task is about adding buildings.

Your edits are extremely damaging.

I am reverting this edit.

Please do not duplicate roads, the HOT task is about adding buildings.

Your edits are extremely damaging.

I am reverting this edit.

Please do not duplicate roads, the HOT task is about adding buildings.

Your edits are extremely damaging.

I am reverting this edit.

Hi, this edit has gone a little wrong.

osm.org/way/927881965 and other buildings you have drawn are not single terraces, there are service ways passing between them so they should be split.

Cheers Phil

You have added a lot of place=village, which is clearly not what is here. Please only add what is verifiable on the ground.

This edit is very damaging, please do not add random roads to OSM

This edit is very damaging, please do not add random roads to OSM

In this change you have duplicated many roads with secondary, this is very damaging and I am reverting this edit.

Hi, in this edit you seem to have created a very small duplicate hospital.
I have removed this duplication.

Cheers Phil

Hi, thank you for your edit.

In OSM we should not copy from third-party plans without explicit permission.

The gold standard in OSM is to simply go and have a look and map what you have seen and use source=survey.

Cheers Phil

Just wondering why you added a motorway here?

Bore da
Croisi Y OSM, place=village is a very strange way to tag houses and gardens. Please take care to capture what is actually visible on imagery.

Diolch Phil

Hi
Names in OSM are for things that have an actual name, in the case of roads have an actual sign.

Please do not add descriptions to the name tag.

See osm.wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_use_name_tag_to_describe_things

Cheers Phil

This route is a legally a bridleway.

Have added appropriate access tags, setting the middle track section to private for motor vehicles which will prevent motor vehicles from being routed that way whilst maintaining access for foot/bikes/horses and farm vehicles

Cheers Phil

Why have you removed the traffice islands here? One of your colleagues vandalised this area two days ago, and has yet to respond to my comments.

I am reverting this again as it was correct.

Cheers Phil

You also broke the transition point between the 40 mph and 50 mph zones which is clear if you select the best imagery.

Hi, this edit is very very wrong. Queensway is not a dual carriageway, there are just some small islands either side of the traffic lights.

Roads should only be mapped as separate ways where there is physical separation.

I am reverting this edit.

Legally a bridleway so motor_vehicle=private and added access tags for foot/horses and bikes

The track you have photos of is probably Turners Lane. This section is legally a public footpath and therefore should not be used by motor vehicles, that is not to mention the geography of the area. Turners Lane is diagonal for a reason.

Who are you working for?

Please read a conform to https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines before making further changes to the map.

Tagging in osm is about what is legal, not what is safe or possible for vans. This track is used by agricultural vehicles and is legal for horses and cyclists. Adding a tracktype will indicate to a router if it is suitable for a particular type of vehicle.