OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
126132783 almost 3 years ago

Hi Sam
I tried to contact you over a week ago asking what your motivation is for changing a large number of unclassified roads to tertiary but you have not responded and have continued making these damaging edits. As a mapper I consider this very disrespectful.

This road over the Beacons has been mapped as unclassified for over 10 years, why do you consider that to be wrong? It certainly does not meet my expectations of a tertiary and your edits could result in some very poor routing decisions.

Also please use meaningful changeset comments that inform your fellow mappers of your intentions, line correction is just meaningless gobbledeegook.

Your edits are over a wide area, have you surveyed them? I believe they should be reverted asap.

Cheers Phil

125866612 almost 3 years ago

This seems an odd change, unclassified is probably the correct tag as this road is quite narrow.

Wondering why you changed it as it has been unclassified since it was first mapped 11 years ago.

Cheers Phil

124896240 almost 3 years ago

I have finally got around to updating the operator:type to charitable.

Cheers Phil

124816262 almost 3 years ago

What does #waymap-project-SB mean?

125560125 almost 3 years ago

Shouldn't Fish Street be oneway again now it has reopened?

Cheers Phil

124996387 almost 3 years ago

No response so reverting

117387498 almost 3 years ago

No response so reverting

125144364 almost 3 years ago

No response so I have removed the grid reference from the reference tag.

125146177 almost 3 years ago

No response so reverting

121972679 almost 3 years ago

Is there really drinking water here, seems a bit far from civilisation to find safe clean drinking water.

54510254 almost 3 years ago

Hi, just wondering why you changed the name of this hamlet?

125272601 almost 3 years ago

Thank you.

Hope you got recovered quite quickly.

I will revert this one.

Cheers Phil

125272601 almost 3 years ago

Since when have there been signs prohibiting pedestrians?

Foot=no is for legal restrictions.

Cheers Phil

125146177 almost 3 years ago

Hallo
Dies sind zwar nicht die vernünftigsten Manöver, aber sie sind nicht wirklich illegal. Es gibt hier keine Schilder, die U-turns verbieten.
Welche Quellen haben Sie verwendet?

124996387 almost 3 years ago

Why have you removed motorcycle=clothing?

In doing so you have thrown away surveyed information that said this is a shop that sells motorcycle clothing and turned it into a shop that sells motorcycles.

Cheers Phil

117387498 almost 3 years ago

Hi. use_sidepath is a very unusual tag to find on a road in the UK. I cannot see any signs indicating this restriction on mapillary. What sources are you using?

Cheers Phil

124040656 almost 3 years ago

Hi, I am baffled as to why you have added use_sidepath here? On mapillary I cannot see any signs prohibiting pedestrians or cyclists on this road so wondering what your sources are?

Cheers Phil

125118344 almost 3 years ago

Sorry, found it further back. There would normally be a sign at the junction.

Cheers Phil

125118344 almost 3 years ago

Hi, just wondering what sources you have use for this turn-restriction?

There are no signs visible om mapillary so I I wondering how you have concluded that there is a restriction here?

Cheers Phil

124808422 almost 3 years ago

Hi
Wondering why you have changed some footways to paths?

Path is a problematic tag in England/Wales due to access rules. Footway implies foot only, which along with designation=public_footpath is correct. The problem with path it needs a load of access tags to be meaningful. Many applications will assume that cycling is allowed oh highway=path, unless it is tagged as bicycle=no which then results in illegal routing decisions made by some apps (komoot spings to mind).

Cheers Phil