Der richtige Wikidata-Eintrag sollte eigentlich Q1307286 sein, oder?

I would assume that Walter did not intentionally move this node from Africa to Europe in this changeset: Walter seems to be an experienced user, and this changeset looks quite fine (adding a precise cuisine tag, teaking the coordinates slightly) if it wasn't affecting the wrong node. – I've asked him now in a personal message (in German) for further details of what's been going on in this changeset from his perspective.

Hello. Thanks for your contributions. But could you please try to provide your fellow mappers with a short description in your changeset comment field. It only takes a few seconds to fill out, but would provide other mappers much needed information to better understand your edits and intentions. You can find more information about that topic also on the osm wiki: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thanks! And happy mapping! :)

PS: I couldn't help but notice that the comment on this changeset could be better. Please read osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments – your fellow mappers would appreciated that very much :)

Now the restaurant is duplicated in Vienna:

* osm.org/node/5009482079
* osm.org/node/5009482081

It's really strange that this happened at all. The two node ids differ only by 2, but it's not a single bitflip. Did you do something special with JOSM while editing this node, Walter?

Hi. Bitte mappe keine Phantasie-Objekte in OpenStreetMap. Siehe auch: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-at/2017-September/008973.html

reverted

reverted

reverted

This user's edits are likely pure vandalism: osm.org/user_blocks/1470

reverted

reverted

reverted

reverted

reverted

reverted

reverted

reverted

reverted

reverted