OK: Invece a aggiungere il cancello come un punto separato, puoi anche selezionare uno dei punti ("nodi") della via dove il cancello si trova e mettere il cancello su quello. In questo modo abbiamo mappato anche l'informazione su quale via il cancello si trova.

Ho fatto due screenshot dove puoi vedere la differenza dei due approcci: Singolo punto, non collegato alla via: https://imgur.com/EOqRYql,CVOVXeo#0 / nodo direttamente sulla via: https://imgur.com/EOqRYql,CVOVXeo#1
Tutto chiaro?

Ciao Marco! Is there a reason why you didn't put this barrier node on the way/road (where it normally belongs to)? The same applies also to some of your nearby edits.

naja, Hausnummern doppelt finde ich persönlich eigentlich gar nicht so schlimm. Besser doppelt als gar nicht. Bei den restlichen Punkten muss ich luschi aber recht geben!

osm.org/way/312242309 – meinstest du da vielleicht leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian ?

Ich habe die fehlerhaften Daten schon herausgenommen, war halb so wild. Auch habe ich dir eine persönliche Nachricht geschickt mit weiteren Infos zu (Wander)routen in OSM.

Wäre schön, dich in Zukunft mehr von dir auf OpenStreetMap zu sehen. :)

Hallo! Willkommen bei OSM!

Ein Hinweis zu deiner Bearbeitung: Du hast einen neuen Weg eingezeichnet, der aber in großen Teilen parallel zu bereits bestehenden Straßen verläuft. Das ist in der Regel leider inkorrekt, denn als Fußweg sollten nur die Stücke eingezeichnet, die wirklich auch Fußgängerwege sind (siehe osm.wiki/DE:Tag:highway=footway?).

Wolltest du vielleicht in Wirklichkeit eine Wanderroute anlegen? Wenn ja, dann funktioniert das etwas anders als du es versucht hast. Falls du Hilfe benötigst, helfe ich dir gern weiter.

Martin

Thank you!
PS: For such things you can also use the "South Tyrol Topomap" (published by the provincial administration cartography department and free to use for OSM). It is even available as a background layer in the iD editor. ;)

Why don't you simply save each individual OSMI fix in an individual changeset?

Thank you for fixing so many routing data issues! But, can you please try to generate less continent-spanning changesets in the future? That would be great.

Hi, du hast hier bei einigen Gebäuden in Wagersfeld als addr:street "Hauptstraße" angegeben (z.B. hier: osm.org/way/318184455), obwohl die Straße in OSM "Wagersfeldstraße" (osm.org/way/29724265) heißt. Was stimmt denn wirklich?

I've downgraded the road LS162 over the Kreiter Sattel to "unclassified" again, because it is a very quiet road which doesn't really have a connecting function. It is also very narrow around the top of the saddle.

(Not every LS/SP road has to be tagged as tertiary! And not every tertiary road needs to have a LS/SP ref.)

*Eventually* the remaining part of LS162 (from LS19) with the short piece of communal road to Klughammer could be considered a tertiary road (as it connects the hamlet to the main road and town), but as the hamlet is so little I'd leave it as is.

perfect, thanks! :)

If they are used in both directions (idk if that's the case / isn't it hard to measure the cars' speeds & take photos if there is contraflow traffic?) we could map that as two separate enforcement relations…

Thanks for mapping the new speed cameras! :) But, I think adding "enforcement" relations is still necessary to set the direction of the camera and from where to where the speed is monitored? See osm.wiki/Relation:enforcement

The elevation of this peak (8747) can't possibly be correct: on SRTM it is measured at around 5200 meters…

Pab, why don't you use changeset comments? Could you please try to describe your changes in a quick sentence or two in the future? That would it much easier for the rest of us to follow your work and understand changesets such as this one. Thank you! :)

From Wikipedia: „Il comune [di Predaia] è stato istituito il 1º gennaio 2015 per fusione dei territori comunali di Coredo, Smarano, Taio, Tres e Vervò.“

Danke für deine vielen Maproulette Ausbesserungen!
Hier war aber das von dir eingefügte tunnel=culvert leider fehl am Platz, denn man sieht am Bing-Bild recht eindeutig, dass der Bach nur etwas ungenau eingezeichnet war, und 20m daneben die Straße über eine recht markante Brücke führt, welche in OSM auch noch nicht drin war. Das nächste mal vielleicht bitte ein wenig mehr Sorgfalt walten lassen beim Armchair-Mapping. ;-)
Trotzdem nochmal danke für deine Mühen. LG, Martin!

Hi! I see that you list google maps and tobacco as sources for this changeset. Please note that using these commerial copyrighted maps are not allowed to be used as sources for OpenStreetMap! (See the following wiki page for more information: osm.wiki/Legal_FAQ#2a._Can_I_trace_data_from_Google_Maps.2FNokia_Maps.2F....3F)

Please consider re-verifying your additions using any free, open data material, wikipedia or old/out-of-copyright maps. (The following page has a list of potential data sources: osm.wiki/IT:Potential_Datasources)

--