Thanks, but the Hotel was already on the map since at least 2 years ago: see osm.org/way/88059884

I've removed the duplicate now.

FYI: osm.org/note/676114

Hi,

I'm quite sure that the outline broke in exactly this changeset. But there's no need for a revert, as I've already fixed the data yesterday.

It's possible that something went wrong while uploading the changeset data, maybe.

Esatto!

PS: There's no reason to put name:it tags on objects that only have one name alone (which the majority of places, roads, shops, etc). The above mentioned ambiguity-issues are only present when an object is named in at least two different languages.

Excuse me for writing in English ;)

It's common practice to include the local language also in the name:* tags. Just take a look around how similar objects are tagged, for example Praha has a name that's the same as name:cs: osm.org/relation/439840

There's a reason for having the local name also in its own separate name:* tag when also other name:* tags exist. This is how keepright.at puts it: “To help applications choose the best matching language they should know the language used for the name tag. It is therefore necessary to provide a name:XX tag with the same content as found in the name tag where XX specifies the language used for the name tag.”

For example, let's assume there's a place node with only name=Roma and name:en=Rome set, and an Italian-speaking citizen comes along, whose navigation device is set to prefer languages in the following order: 1) Italian 2) English 3) Whatever the local language is. If there's no name:it=Roma, the navigation software can't know that "Roma" is actually an Italian name and would falsely fall back to English.

A similar problem occurs if one would try to produce a worldwide map in a specific language with fallbacks (e.g. an Italian map with English as fallback).

Hi!
I think this changeset accidentally broke the outline of Italy ("Penisola italiana")! There are a couple of pieces missing between Fano and Pesaro, see https://imgur.com/a/CuM4e

PS: What editor did you use to make these edits? There is no indication in the changeset metadata (which is usually set by all other major editors such as JOSM, iD, etc.). Furthermore, it looks like as if this changeset introduced multiple new versions of the relation which is quite odd and looks almost like a bug in the software you're using.

Oops, I think my first comment went to the wrong changeset (the boundary actually got broken in another changeset: osm.org/changeset/41453004). Sorry for the confusion.

Also, did you discuss this large-scale edit with the community (I didn't see anything on talk-it lately, but that doesn't have to mean anything ^^).

More to the point: I don't think that removing "name:it" tags, e.g. from boundaries (e.g. of "Pompei" or "Trento") was a good idea. What was the rationale behind it?

Hi!

I think this changeset accidentally broke the outline of Italy! There are a couple of pieces missing between Fano and Pesaro, see https://imgur.com/a/CuM4e

Hi Pavel,

Welcome to OSM, but I have a few questions about your first addition: What kind of "attraction" is this? Does it have a name? And is it really in the middle of the parking lot?

Che cos'é questa highway=construction: osm.org/way/271183751? Non si vede niente su bing (e neanche su nuove orthofoto del 2014).

Is this one different from the already existing camp site "Punta Indiani": osm.org/way/298271996 ?

Hi. Zur Info: In osm.org/note/670493 weist ein User darauf hin, dass osm.org/way/339098515 (zumindest im oberen Teil) nicht auffindbar wäre.

OK, danke für die Info. Habs entsprechend angepasst!

OK, ist wiederhergestellt.

Ok, erledigt.

Das waren keine "Kirchen", sondern Wegkreuze. Gibt es diese hier nicht mehr?

Gibt es die Touristeninformation (-Büro) hier nicht mehr?

Gibt es die beiden Informationstafeln hier wirklich nicht mehr? Bitte gib als Changeset-Kommentar etwas aussagekräftigeres als "Korrektur" an (z.B. "Informationstafeln gelöscht, weil nicht mehr vorhanden.", oder so ähnlich). Danke!