Hallo! Willkommen bei OSM. Ein kleiner Hinweis: Wanderwege bitte lieber als "Pfad" eintragen statt "Fußweg" (habs hier schon geändert), und wenn möglich bitte auch gleich die "Wanderweg Klassifizierung" mit angeben, siehe osm.wiki/DE:Key:sac_scale
Schöne Grüße!

Vedo che hai mappati seguenti cancelli con "foot=no":
osm.org/node/2399590924
osm.org/node/2399590936

Sono veramente chiusi anche per pedoni (che sembra strano, essendo parte di una malga e parte del sentiero escursionistico 25A)?

Vedi anche questa nota: osm.org/note/410012

Das habe ich mir gedacht. Danke fürs Ausbessern!

Was hat es denn mit dem "Golfplatz" Wolfgangskirche hier auf sich?

(turns out the bridge is not completed yet. I've misread the article. Thanks Tomi for the information!)

I saw it more or less by chance as large parts of the map went yellow all of a sudden. But there is a nice tool called "whodidit" that lets one monitor a specific area quite easily: http://zverik.osm.rambler.ru/whodidit/

Hm. I think not. What I wanted to tell is that you had converted the whole forest (osm.org/relation/155451) into a car park the size of many km². That's simply impossible. :-D

I do not doubt that there is a missing car park somewhere, but if you would like to add it, you have to draw a new area for it using the appropriate area-drawing-tool in the OSM editor.

Hi. Welcome to OSM.

In this changeset, you apparently converted the whole forest into a car park. I guess that wasn't your intention, was it? I have fixed the issue it in the meantime.

--

Hallo! Willkommen bei OSM! In diesem Änderungssatz hast du anscheinend aus Versehen ein großes Waldgebiet in einen Autoparkplatz umgewandelt. Ich habe den Fehler inzwischen behoben.

The bridge has been completed, hasn't it? See https://www.stol.it/Artikel/Chronik-im-Ueberblick/Lokal/Twenty-Bruecke-ueber-den-Eisack-fertiggestellt

Aha ja. Das hatte ich übersehen. Danke für die Infos!

see osm.org/note/387121

Hi. Kannst du vielleicht schnell mal auf folgendes Note schauen: osm.org/note/386012
Danke

Kann es sein, dass hier Bahnsteig 1 vergessen worden ist?

I've reverted this changeset as it added a huge kink to the road network (Sackstraße). See http://imgur.com/ewg6m15 and osm.org/changeset/32179119

I've reverted this changeset. Because it introduced overlapping and invalid landuse geometries.

Wurde die Bushaltestelle tatsächlich auf die andere Seite der Kreuzung verlegt?

erledigt: osm.org/changeset/31917144

Würde für so einen Brunnen nicht besser amenity=drinking_water (anstatt man_made=standpipe) passen? Siehe auch osm.org/node/3586177795

Ah, I found some official maps showing the road connecting at the roundabout, just like I guessed above: http://gis.gvcc.net/WebGis/02/21012/browse.jsp . (I've adjusted the route already.)

And sorry again for reverting your valuable addition so quickly even before asking; that wasn't very nice from me!

Oh, OK. I'm sorry and I will revert this changeset, of course.

But could you please use better changeset comments next time when doing non-obvious changes (e.g. like here: adding a new road which is not yet visible on aerial imagery)? In osm.org/changeset/31348540 you simply stated "ajout divers" which made it hard for me to verify your changes. Thank you!

Btw: Are you sure the new road does connects at osm.org/node/2188350734 to the secondary road and not at the roundabout a few meters to the East of that, which would make more sense from a road construction point of view (at the node where you drew the connection, the secondary is on a underpass)?