OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
11383764 almost 6 years ago

Hi Gunther Schorghofer,

Trust you are well.

While reviewing the road network in Singapore, I came across the way 633271549 it seems to be bi-directional from satellite imagery and also lane demarcation are supporting .

Please look into this and suggest whether it is uni-directional or bi-directional.

Thanks in advance.

51057897 about 6 years ago

Hi AkuAnakTimur,

Thankful for your valuable time on this concern.

Necessary edits have been done.

Thank you
udaykiran3

65078491 about 6 years ago

"Hi AkuAnakTimur,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Alor Setar, I have come across the

""way 287594160
way 706594491
way 706594490""

classified as 'unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,it can be classified as 'service'.

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this.

Thanks in advance."

27846671 about 6 years ago

"Hi AkuAnakTimur,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Alor Setar, I have come across the

"way 287594070
way 287593907
way 287594154
way 287593882
way 287593866"

classified as 'unclassified' and residential. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,it can be classified as 'service'.

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this.

Thanks in advance."

51057897 about 6 years ago

"Hi AkuAnakTimur,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Alor Setar, I have come across the

""way 380442633
way 380540697
way 515907527
way 515907528
way 380442629
way 515907529
way 380442631
way 706542496
way 515009756""

classified as 'unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around it can be classified as 'residential'.

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this.

Thanks in advance."