corrected (and a number of similar errors elsewher). Thanks for spotting this.

Faccio riferimento a una serie di shape present in OSM da quattro anni, ma non ancora taggati, Sono tutti con "area=yes" e un tag del tipo "fixme=Import CTR Veneto. Isolato. Usare landuse idoneo es. landuse=residential". In alcuni (rari) casi hanno bordi in comune con edifici importati e già taggati. Combaciano. Lo spostamento è di circa 3m NNW nella zona dove mi muovo adesso (Eraclea - San Donà). Vorrei dare l'allarme prima dell'importazione definitiva. Ovviamente anche tutti gli edifici già visibili sarebbero da spostare, come ho già sottolineato in tante occasioni.

Questi shape non ancora utilizzate sono spostati sistematicamente in confronto a tracce GPX e PCN2006

Please correct retaining_wall tag directions as appropriate, or remove them all together

Hi Brandon, you replaced the street name with the name of the running trail that runs along this street. If the running trail is trailblazed you should use a running route relation to represent it, but not change the name of the street. See osm.wiki/Relation:route
If you need help doing this, please contact me via OSM.

#LooksLikeVandalism

#LooksLikeVandalism

Please put the cinema back in its place

It's a typo. Should be "start_date=C17". (typo corrected by another user, thanks)
The meaning is "built during the 17th century" (see osm.wiki/Key:start_date)

Ich verstehe nicht, warum tie Tatsache, dass zwei Behinderten-Parkplaete vorhanden sind nicht mit dem ueblichen und von JOSM unterstuetzten tag "capacity:disabled", sondern mit "wheelchair:description=x Behindertenparkplätze vorhanden" getagged ist. Dies betrifft moeglicherweise eine ganze Reihe von Parkplaetzen in Deutschland. Auch das tag "toilets:wheelchair=no" ist nicht sinnvoll an einem Supermarkt-Parkplatz, and dem gar keine Toilette vorhanden ist.

It looks as if this mega-farm (relation 5633277) is an error

Ho scoperto per caso una discrepanza di numero civico (node: 3764971560). Sulla mappa è civico 48, ma il ristorante lì, "Al Vwecio Mulin", dice che sono al civico 66.

Buildings in this changeset are generally shifted in position by about 4m in direction north with resect to PCN2006 photos. In addition the contents was already considerably out of date when imported. An example: way 130024210 was imported in 2011 and shows a previous industrial building. PCN2006 (!) photos show already the new buildings which are there now.

This tree import seems to be based on unsuitable data. You have sprinkles the landscape with the occasional tree, but clearly visible tree rows are missing. Please check the source data. I also notice that this import seems not to be reported on the Lombardia import pages (osm.wiki/Lombardia_ToDo#Database_topografico_.282014.29)

Thanks for the check. Corrected.

Typo corrected. The northwestern part of Via Fanti is bidirectional, hence "oneway=no". The remaining part is "oneway=yes"

In questa zona c'è un grosso problema di non-allineamento degli edifici importati con le foto satellitari:
PCN2006: 4m sud
PCN2012: 10m sud
Bing Satellite: 9m sud

This import is low quality. Position errors througout. Many false retaining walls. Trees are incomplete and also wrong. Tree rows are missing (look at Bevilacqua)

Be careful when armchair mapping. Way 74799058 is a water or gas pipeline, not a foot bridge. Also the connecting paths are fantasy.
:-(

What is the source for the two big relations 4452767 and 4452701?